"Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Hitler were Atheists, therefore all atheists are wrong/ evil"


This post is taken from my outside blog: The Atheist Goddess!


Wednesday, April 7, 2010
"Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Hitler were atheists, therefore all atheists are wrong/ evil"
This argument is one I have heard at least once or twice, although it appears to be less common than the popular "design argument," "argument from ignorance," and "argument from personal experience." However, it is no less filled with enormous logical fallacies than these more common arguments.

Unfortunately for theists, the "argument from evil" (which is what they are attemptiong to use) doesn't work for them. In fact, it works against their argument against atheists! Why?

Human beings are fallible and definitely not all good! This fact is recognized by theists and atheists alike. I have often met theists who deny that people of their faith who commit atrocities are "not real Christians/ Muslims/ Jews/ Hindus/ etc." However, I have yet to meet an atheist that denies that atheists who committed atrocities, ex. Moe Zedong and Stalin, were "not really atheists."
BUT! This is IRRELEVANT to the legitimacy of atheism!

So why does this argument from evil not work against atheists? We don't doubt the existence of evil, and the majority of us don't believe in an entity [natural or otherwise] that is "omni-benevolent" [i.e. All-good]. Nor do we deny that there are evil and/ or illogical atheists among us that occasionally stain our midst, there are.

Yet, the presence of evil among atheists does not destroy the legitimacy of atheism! REMEMBER! Atheism is simply a lack of belief in God/ Gods. Nothing else is universal among us. So, the argument that there are evil atheists is as harmless to the idea of atheism as being hit by a water balloon.

*Also, a little side note: Although Stalin and Mao were definitely atheists, the idea that Hitler was one is up for debate.

It is confirmed that Hitler was raised in the Austro-Hungarian Empire as a young boy and that his mother was a highly religious Christian. I believe I heard that Hitler was raised as a Catholic, but whatever type of Christian he was, he was not an atheist. To my knowledge there is no documentation of Hitler renouncing his faith. [However, some have suggested that he had an interest in the occult - whih still doesn't prove that he wasn't a Christian, btw.]

Back to the argument from evil, we have covered the ground of the harmlessness of using the argument against evil against atheists, but why is that argument beneficial to atheists and detrimental to theists who believe in the Abrahamic God?

There is a simple answer to this:

The traditional and most commonly accepted idea of God is that he/ she is "all-powerful," "all-good," and "all-knowing." [At the same time] The essence of the argument from evil is that there is a TITANIC problem with this notion from the start!

I'll spell it out simply for you:

The three combating notions of the Judao-Christian-Islamic God with regards to evil:

1. God is all powerful

This means that he can do anything, including stop evil and create it.

2. God is All-Good

This means that God would never commit evil.

3. God is Omnicient

This means that God knows everything.

Are we on the same page here? I'm sure many of you Christians and Muslims, etc. would agree with these ideas.


To illustrate my point I will combine 2 at a time and show how the third cannot work with the existence of evil:

1. God is all powerful and God is all good:


Okay, no contradiction here, maybe this God DOESN'T KNOW that evil exists? Sure, that works.

2. God is all good and God knows everything:


Okay, this works too, assuming God can't do anything about the evil that exists.

3. God knows everything and God is all-powerful:


Sure! This works as well, maybe God desn't care about evil? Or maybe God IS evil himself? Evil Gods and Goddesses DID exist in past religions [esp. Polytheistic ones].

But! God is all Good + All Powerful + All Knowing?
Why would evil exist with a god like that?! No matter which way you turn you have to take away one of these qualities to make your god fit.

You don't think so?
Okay! I challenge you, theists, to present me with evidence for why a god with all three qualities could exist with evil! BUT! Be prepared for me to critique your argument and call you out if you omit one of the three qualities!
Posted by SkycometGoddess at 5:28 PM
Labels: "God" "three" "qualities" "omni" "good" "all" "knowing" "all" "powerful" "contradicition" "argument" "problem" "from" "of" "evil"

Views: 2627

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Oh. So Stalin was a theist? Well... whether he was or not doesn't really matter... my argument still stands.
Thanks! BTW... I am finished now. I just had to fix the pictures I tried to put in. ^_^
The most elegant summation of this thought (IMO) was Epicurus, something like 300 BC (so fie on those theists who claim that atheism is some new movement...)

"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?"
They dig themselves a hole by saying this. "God did not create evil" is irrelevent. Okay... if God did not create evil, did he try to stopit but can't? Can he stop it but he didn't? Does he not know about it?

However the second thing IS relevant. If God "CAN'T" interfere with freewill then they have violated the terms of the challenge, they have deleted the "omnipotent" trait. "Can't" is a word that doesn't work with an omnipotent god.

So these "answers" are not acceptable responses to the question.

However, I AGREE!! They probably will result to that. And when that doesn't work they'll pull that ever-annoying "he works in mysterious ways" thing out of the air.
HA!!! XD!! Atheism is FAR older than any religion!! Atheism has been around since the first God was invented... whenever that was. lol
This is called "Reductio ad hitlerum". I'ts often used by religious people.
What is "evil" and "good"? Are they objective or subjective?
Evil does harm to people
Good is either neutral or helpful to people.
What if something harms people in order to do a greater "good" what is that? And what is "harm"? ex. is Andrew Jackson "evil" for what he did to the native americans, or was he "good" for doing what he did?
And if I say to a christian, "Christians killed the indians, murder gay people, and bomb abortion clinics", he would just tell me "you can't judge the entire religion based on a few radicals". Hypocrites.
I've heard the argument that "God did not create evil. Evil is simply an absence of God."
Which brings up 2 points.
1) God isn't much of a god if he can be freaking absent from certain places.. does he get paid sick leave?
2) Right.. then who created hell again?
Hitler was Christian. He had dinner with the pope during his reign several times.

Beyond that, it's ridiculous to point fingers when Christianity (and other organized religions) have wreaked so much havoc, death, ugliness, persecution, fear, guilt, and horror over the history of man. It can go either way. I didn't realize we were keeping score.

Saying something like that, anyway, is like saying that a mass murderer who is a regular church-going fellow is a mass murderer because of his religious beliefs. Maybe that is the reason, but you can't just connect dots like that at random.


© 2021   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service