Comment by Kris Feenstra on June 13, 2011 at 7:50pm

What's sad is, even attacking a fictional deity such as the FSM while facing no opposition, he still manages to lose the debate.

Comment by Heather Spoonheim on June 13, 2011 at 7:59pm

It's time to just update the FSM to be 'beyond' timespace and immaterial - he's done it with Yahweh so fair is fair, right?

Comment by Steve on June 13, 2011 at 8:05pm

Heather is right. The standard counter to this is moving the goalposts

Comment by Greg Gorey on June 13, 2011 at 8:06pm

the FSM is an intelligent design joke because they wouldn't name the designer. he and other apologists completely miss the point.

Comment by sanssensibility on June 13, 2011 at 8:09pm

Wow!  What he's a great example of talking a lot but not saying anything at all.  Thanks! (I'm guessing the "Dr." is a degree in theology?  Yeah, those don't actually count for anything.)

Comment by Gary C on June 13, 2011 at 8:24pm

Funny, Dr. Stephen Hawking has studied the origin of the universe for longer and to a deeper degree than almost anybody alive, and he is convinced there is no God required.  What does this guy think he knows that Dr. Hawking doesn't?

They turn ignorance into a virtue...

 

Comment by Mike Glickman on June 13, 2011 at 8:57pm

I feel like I need to take a shower every time I get done listening to WLC talk.

Comment by Bernard on June 13, 2011 at 9:04pm

He's got it completely wrong - The FSM does NOT have meatball eyes, as can be clearly seen from the pictures handed down to us. Also there is no evidence on the interweb to suggest that the FSM is a physical being.

Comment by Walden Bowen on June 13, 2011 at 9:35pm

So Jesus couldn't have been God either, because he existed in space and time, maybe.

Comment by Rick on June 14, 2011 at 12:19am

Really? He’s trying to debunk one work of fiction to justify another? Sounds desperate, even by religious standards.

Comment

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page