I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT, but since the website is severely overloaded at the moment I am uploading it here. Original: http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/tyso...
Tags:
Comment by Dave Gibbs on December 11, 2011 at 4:26pm Excellent "haiku" answer he gave at the end in response to that cookie cutter false dilemma question.
Comment by KaraC on December 11, 2011 at 4:59pm Actually it is more fully expressed by
E2 = (p2c2) + (m2c4)
though physicists usually set c=1 and use
E2 = p2 + m2
but you do have to take care over units if you use that.
Comment by KaraC on December 11, 2011 at 5:00pm The numbers below are superscript but the formatting got lost :-)
Thanks, KaraC
There's a decent disussion about this at
Comment
Started by Mercedes in Welcome to Think Atheist. Last reply by James Cox 4 minutes ago. 579 Replies 0 Likes
Posted by richard vitzthum on May 25, 2013 at 11:38am 15 Comments 3 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!
Join Think Atheist