Proof macro-evolution is false

Views: 328

Comment by Victor Pariter on August 21, 2011 at 4:36pm

The video above is an abomination of scientific thought. And to imagine this pollution is all around us is scary, to say the least!

Please watch and comment. 

Comment by Victor Pariter on August 21, 2011 at 6:47pm
Historically, they will shoot the first shot. A la religious tradition lol
Comment by Jay on August 21, 2011 at 8:32pm

Athiest cannot afford to be silent.

Comment by Meghan McWilliams on August 21, 2011 at 8:35pm

Please tell me this is fake.

Comment by UnTarded on August 21, 2011 at 9:19pm

The first sentence instantly shows the fundy christardation. Evolution is NOT the study of life's origins, it is the study of how life changed once it started.

"...any theory on the origin of life the earth or on any other planet, as far as I'm concerned is a fairy tale.

These folks are either willfully ignorant or just plain liars.

A bit of both methinks.

Comment by Victor Pariter on August 21, 2011 at 9:58pm

@megan, nope, not fake :(


Comment by matt.clerke on August 21, 2011 at 11:38pm
*facepalm* seriously...the peanut butter again? Come on guys, thoroughly debunked already (despite its obvious falsity)
Comment by Richard Raymond on August 22, 2011 at 8:24am
These people obviously never evolved "intelligently". How can they simplify something that is so complicated that even evolutionists struggle to understand it. That's why we need to teach science and critical thinking skills at an early age. This is like saying there's no bacteria in water because I can't see it with my eyes and to prove it I'll drink the glass of water. LOL
Comment by Robert Karp on August 22, 2011 at 10:27am

Puuhhlease - Everyone knows of the well documented 1976 incident where spontaneous life emerged from a jar of peanut butter. This debunking was debunked years ago. The actual footage from said incident is below.


Comment by Albert Bakker on August 22, 2011 at 11:51am

If that poor guy's hypothesis is that abiogenesis and evolution to macro-cellular lifeforms visible with the unaided eye by untrained observers never takes place in a jar of peanut butter within a reasonable time: say somewhat before or after expiration date, then he is indeed allowed to say that his hypothesis has been thoroughly verified.

I'm not entirely getting what's the point of this peanut butter conjecture though.


You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

© 2018   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service