As a nonscientist, it's daunting for me to work thru the huge volume of information on global climate change.
I've found that the most reliable scientific information comes from respected peer reviewed science journals .

But journals have lots of big words, and lots of small print, and very few illustrations to make it easy for me. You can see why climate denies don't like them.
But that's where the facts are.

How can you tell a good science journal?

BBC Interview with Phil Jones
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8511670.stm

Daily Mail account
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html

The Economist, review of Daily Mail
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/02/climategate_distortions

Scientific American Cyber bullying
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=climate-cyber-bullying

IPCC Fact and Spin
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/02/ipcc-errors-facts-and-spin/
http://initforthegold.blogspot.com/2010/03/they-got-nothin.html

Truth Fights back - debunking climate denier nonsense
http://www.truthfightsback.com/

The goat woman
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1256398/Chinese-grandmother-grows-devil-horns.html

Richard Lindzen deliberately blurring lines
http://crookedtimber.org/2010/03/03/lindzen-and-no-statistically-significant-warming-since-1995/

Round and Round with Lindzen, Motl, and Jones
http://deepclimate.org/2010/03/02/round-and-round-we-go-with-lindzen-motl-and-jones/

Lubos Motl blog post
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2010/02/the_economist_calls_a_lie_a_li.php#comment-2308004

Low Ball Sea level estimate withdrawn
http://climateprogress.org/2010/02/22/sea-level-rise-global-warming/

Vermeer and Rahmsdorf
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/12/04/0907765106.full.pdf