I don't understand why the states let any religious iconography be put up at all. If you let in one sect, why not let in all? Where does it end? Xenu and a volcano next to a Raelian clone child? It's all unprovable dogma and has no place in the workings of the state.

Views: 47

Comment by Morgan Matthew on December 3, 2008 at 5:47am
I guess I don't see why there need to be any religious displays of any kind in governament buildings. The decorated tree is just that - a decorated tree. People can attach their own beliefs to it any way they want. But both the nativity scene and the opposing sign really seem pointless and a bit childlish being on government property. Keep both of your silly battling mindsets to yourselves!

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

Forum

Belief

Started by Chris Russell in Small Talk Jun 20. 0 Replies

Agnosticism

Started by Chris Russell in Small Talk. Last reply by Chris Russell Jun 6. 11 Replies

I'm not an atheist anymore...

Started by Belle Rose in Small Talk. Last reply by Pope Beanie Jun 12. 19 Replies

Alex J O'Connor

Started by JadeBlackOlive in Small Talk. Last reply by Davis Goodman Jun 1. 3 Replies

Blog Posts

Equuleus - the little horse

Posted by Brad Snowder on July 9, 2017 at 1:08am 0 Comments

Horrified

Posted by Mary smith on July 2, 2017 at 12:35pm 0 Comments

© 2017   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service