Hemant Mehta in the latest Atheist Voice video.
This term has been thrown around on this forum by certain individuals,
and Hemant does a very good job of explaining why it's just silly.
I wonder if types like Hitchens and Dawkins enjoy arguing as much as they care for what they're arguing.
The general indication, given how much time and effort they have invested into the sorts of topics on which they typically debate[d], should be that they cared for what they were arguing more than they enjoyed arguing.
Even if they enjoyed arguing, what's wrong with that. Hitch was so good at demolishing asses, I'd still watch him if he was just arguing for his favorite ice cream flavor.
My Atheism, i.e. my lack of belief is not militant. I am militant against the fundies and those that want to spread their faith into politics and schools. Here is Hitchens on why he was the way he was. Someone tell me where you think he is wrong...if you do.
It is incumbent on any vocal atheist to do their homework PRIOR to engaging the enemy. One needs to be fairly secure/confident in their atheistic foundation; this means having the ability to relate to others a cohesive line of reasoning, and it helps to retain your composure when the other side becomes defensive and personal.
Someone who's grown up their whole lives believing something super natural is self evident ... is unlikely to listen to the TRUTH when it's poking badgering acidic vicious insults while laughs are heard in the background. These books are heroic, a great way to vent frustration, to strengthen ones views on Atheism and to convert a couple people...but there are far better books for the theist soul who thinks Christianity is as real as tables and feathers. It's not the message...it's the approach. And I consider Hitchens and Dawkins as helarious cool intelligent guys...but extreme.
Maybe Fox gets it right once in a blue moon.
Even broken clocks get it right more often than that.
as a former religious guy i used to get angry by the outspoken atheists and their arguments and their questions .. but thanks to their arguments and debates i'm now what i am.i can't call that extremism.
I agree with Hemant in the video: "atheist extremist" is a nonsensical term.
Usually, what people really mean when they day "atheist extremist" is "anti-theist."
Frankly, I don't see how anyone could NOT be an anti-theist. So, I guess you know where I stand on the original issue.
Join Think Atheist
Welcome toThink Atheist
Get Started Nowor Sign In
Or sign in with:
Sunday School July 27th 2014
Sunday School July 20th 2014
Sunday School July 13th 2014
Started by Ed in Small Talk. Last reply by Noel 35 minutes ago.
Started by Unseen in Politics, Economics, Civil and Reproductive Rights, International Conflicts. Last reply by Unseen 3 hours ago.
Started by Davis Goodman in Small Talk. Last reply by Gregg R Thomas 4 hours ago.
Started by Gallup's Mirror in Bible thumpers. Last reply by Pastafarian Larry 5 hours ago.
Started by RobertPiano in Religion and the Religious, Atheism and Atheists. Last reply by Muckle Cuddy 8 hours ago.
Posted by D.M Barrera on July 21, 2014 at 10:00am
Posted by Quincy Maxwell on July 20, 2014 at 9:37pm
When you drink water, how is it distributed around the body?
We are in love with our Amazon
Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!
Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com
In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media
© 2014 Created by Dan.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.