Who "designed the designer" objection

Right!!!... then now I am blocked with this little problem. Someone knows what is the argument from believers to attack the "who designed the designer" question made it during thousands debates between atheists and theists?. Please advice. 

Views: 6

Comment by Heather Spoonheim on April 10, 2011 at 6:42am
Same answer they use for everything - goddidit and that's final, no reason to go poking your nose into dem dare books lookin' for smarty pantz answers.
Comment by Mac B on April 10, 2011 at 6:53am
I asked Kevin Harris who's on here trying to provide scientific explanation to everything in the bible, he just said "God's eternal". Sort of stops the discussion dead, doesn't it?
Comment by Carlos Lopez on April 10, 2011 at 7:03am
There should be something else than the silly answer of "godidit and the eternal crap". Probably the argument of the first cause is not a big deal after all. :)
Comment by Mac B on April 10, 2011 at 7:05am
There isn't, just accept it, magic man dunnit.

Comment by Mac B on April 10, 2011 at 7:12am
To be perfectly honest I've watched a lot of debates but can't really remember what they answer to this. Nothing that's made any sense to me anyway, someone might have a good answer but I don't think religious people can really counter this with anything of substance. We know that complexity evolves from simplicity, most accept that but just doesn't want to think about the infinite regress problem I guess, I don't know.
Comment by Wesley on April 10, 2011 at 8:09am

"God" is supposedly outside the matrix of time, space, causality, duality that we think of as this existence and material universe.  He both supercedes and envelopes everything that we can imagine.  He is 'eternal' because he created time...not because he has existed forever..(even though he has).

 

The who designed the designer paradox has always bothered me".   If God didn't start, God didn't grow.  God has never grown, matured, learned or anything, yet somehow possesses ALL KNOWLEDGE, ALL WISDOM, and is PERFECT AND COMPLETE.  The big question becomes..if God is all of these things then what ripple of disturbance prompted him to create something in the first place? From where did the first thought come from?  Did he get bored?  Was he lonely?  Can a perfect and complete being get bored and lonely?  How can a perfect and complete being become motivated to do anything?

 

Comment by Doug Reardon on April 10, 2011 at 11:11am
The nuns told me that for something to exist it must occupy space for some amount of time.  Since god did neither it was pretty obvious to me that he didn't.
Comment by Greg Gorey on April 10, 2011 at 12:28pm
Who designed the designer is a bad objection because to argue it, you have to assume that their god is real, then show there are contradictions. however, they think their god never began, so it is an ill formed objection. you would essentially assume that an uncaused cause, then asked what caused it. you can see how this is just a bad think to do.
Comment by Mo Trauen on April 10, 2011 at 3:51pm

There are two responses you will get from the religious.  One is that "it has to stop somewhere" (i.e., the infinite regress).  The other is that "god is eternal". 

 

Atheists can reply to the first "you should stop as soon as your knowledge does".  That means you stop before even postulating the god hypothesis.  The reply to the second is that they are deliberately misinterpreting your question to be about time and timing only.  That is dishonest.  You are not just asking about timing, you are asking about causation.  Once you point that out, you will get the "it has to stop somewhere" type response again, to which you can point out that they should have stopped sooner. 

 

You can also point out that "god is eternal" is circular reasoning because they are borrowing "facts" from their conclusion in order to reach it.  That's a no-no.  Tell then they have to prove god exists AND his attributes before they can assume those attributes.  Assuming them beforehand necessarily assumes he exists and has those attributes.

 

You can also point out that they are claiming to know something they cannot possibly know, the origins of the universe, and that this is a separate question from the existence of god, so you are NOT guilty of the same thing.  And you can point out that they have not solved the mystery, they have simply hidden it inside another mystery.

 

I strongly recommend reading these:

 

http://goodatheistarguments.blogspot.com/2010/09/believers-ask-well...

 

http://goodatheistarguments.blogspot.com/2010/10/does-universes-exi...

 

http://goodatheistarguments.blogspot.com/2010/10/does-universes-exi...

 

http://goodatheistarguments.blogspot.com/2010/09/burden-of-proof.html

 

Comment by Carlos Lopez on April 10, 2011 at 5:21pm
Thanks guys. I will check out those websites.

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

Gizmo Gadget - Purveyros of the finest gadgets this side of the Amazon

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

Backup your stuff: Dropbox and SugarSync.

Atheist Web Hosting. TA members get 20% off
RFEHosting.com
We are in love with our Amazon
Book Store!

 

Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m

© 2013   Created by Morgan Matthew.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service