When it supports their absurd arguments,only then will they believe in separation of church & state

The following is from The Religion Clause, an excellent blog that I  read to keep updated on lawsuits/cases and other such occurrences that  relate to religion and the law.  
Herman Cain is pretty much a nut.  OK, there's no "pretty much" about  it. In this case,  I love how all of a sudden he believes in the  separation of church and state so he can make his argument - a pathetic  and nonsensical one at that.  Any other time they're (Cain and many, many others like him) saying the wall of separation is a "myth" and "not in the constitution".  Now, when it suits their twisted and bigoted purposes, all of a sudden they'll use it to try to strengthen their position.
Monday, July 18, 2011

Herman Cain Says Communities Should Be Able To Block Mosques:

Yesterday, Chris Wallace interviewed Herman Cain, a candidate for the Republican nomination for President (full transcript).   A portion of the interview focused on Cain's sometimes controversial  views of Muslim Americans. Here is an extensive excerpt from the  interview:

WALLACE: You said this week that you oppose construction of a  new mosque in Murfreesboro, Tennessee..... What's your objection to  their building a new mosque?

CAIN: One of my guiding principles, Chris, is that if you  want to know the solution to the problem or if you want to understand  the problem, go to source closest to the problem. I talk to the people  in that community.  And here's their problem and I sympathized with them. Our  Constitution guarantees separation of church and state. Islam combines  church and state. They are using the church part of our First Amendment  to infuse their mosque in that community and the people in the community  do not like it, they disagree with it.  Sharia law is what they are to infuse in to our --

WALLACE: Wait a minute. Are you saying that we should ban Muslims from worshiping in this country?

CAIN: I'm not saying that. What I'm saying is American laws  in American courts. That's what the people of Murfreesboro are  saying.... Well, Chris, I happen to also know that it's not just about a  religious mosque. There are other things going on based upon talking to  the people closest to the problem. It's not a mosque for religious  purposes. This is what the people are objecting to....

WALLACE: ... [M]y question, I guess is, this isn't Ground  Zero in New York City. It's not hallowed ground. Don't Americans have a  right of whatever religion under the Constitution, which you speak so  much about, to free speech and freedom to worship.

CAIN: To the people in Murfreesboro, it is hallowed ground.  They are objecting to the intentions of trying to get Sharia law.... 

WALLACE: But couldn't any community then say we don't want a mosque in our community?

CAIN: ... [L]et's go back to the fundamental issue that the  people are basically saying that they are objecting to. They are  objecting to the fact that Islam is both religion and of set of laws,  Sharia law. That's the difference between any one of our other  traditional religions where it's just about religious purposes.  The people in the community know best. And I happen to side with the people in the community.

WALLACE: So, you're saying that any community, if they want to ban a mosque.

CAIN: Yes, they have the right to do that. That's not  discriminating based upon religion -- against that particular religion.  There is an aspect of them building that mosque that doesn't get talked  about. And the people in the community know what is it and they are  talking about it. 


WALLACE: ... This gets back to an early  controversy where ... you said that you're not comfortable with the idea  of appointing a Muslim for your cabinet. As someone who I'm sure who  faced prejudice growing up ... in the '50s, '60s, how do you respond to  those who say you are doing the same thing?

CAIN: I tell them that that's absolutely not true, because  it is absolutely totally different. I grew up, like you said, in the  '50s and the '60s. I grew up before civilian rights movement, during the  civil rights movement and after the civil rights movement.... We had  some laws that were restricting people because of their color and  because of their color only. That's what that situation was.

WALLACE: But aren't you willing to restrict people because of their religion?

CAIN: I'm willing to take a harder look at people that might  be terrorists. That's what I'm saying. Look, I know that that there's a  peaceful group of Muslims in this country. God bless them and they are  tree to worship. I have no problem with that.  If you at my career, I have never discriminated against  anybody because of their religion, their sex, or origin, or anything  like that. I'm simply saying I owe it to the American people to be  cautious because terrorists are trying to kill us. And so, yes, I'm  going to err on the side of caution, rather than on the side of  carelessness.


So, thoughts, laughter, or mocking anyone would like to share? 

Views: 17


You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

© 2018   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service