I need to show this to my atheist brothers before I start attempting this on theists.
Please berate me as much as possible. All I ask is you try to disprove my claim. I know the burden of proof is on the claimant, but as we understand logical absolutes, there is a point where only a disproof will do.
Existence is. The Statement.
It is 1. And it is not 1. At the same time. And 0 is the end?
Existence is. This is the logic chain.
First, the One.
I have been trying to understand 1 since I was. My attention piqued when I left the whom and discovered everything else. I had finally escaped the system only to find myself in another system. Will this ever stop? I don't know. But I will spiral upward and see what happens.
Existence is. The math chain.
y = 1, Point
y = x, Line
y = ±x, Spiral
I have been trying to understand math since I saw 1. My attention piqued in elementary school when it came so easy. It really is the simplest skill and most true thing humans can study. I knew very little of math until I completed trigonometry. Then we were told to understand calculus. The whole time we had been learning 0 and 1, then they throw ±1 at us. It was mind blowing. I only understood it recently.
Existence is. The religious claim.
God is greater than all things.
Thus, God is Existence.
I have been trying to understand religion since my mother told me, "God is." My attention piqued in community college when I was able to declare atheism. I was young and very naive, but I knew for a fact that God, as every description I had ever heard failed to describe, is not real. Everyone is an atheist relative to everyone else's god.
Existence is. The Justified True Belief claim.
P is true.
S believes that P is true, and
S is justified in believing that P is true.
I have been trying to understand fundamental truth since I was born, but it really piqued my interest during Philosophy 101. As I tried to understand Justified True Belief, I came to the understanding that truth is relative. Truth is relative to both the truth transmitter and the truth receiver.
Once I understood there is both truth and no truth in the statement. I had to dig deeper.
All of my justifications so far have lead to this. This is the simplest way to can transmit this message without being misunderstood. Please give me your thoughts.