Every so often, someone will tell me that atheists are impossible to debate, because they think they know it all. Someone will tell me that I am dismissing their claims before I have even heard them. They accuse me of shutting out the “evidence” they have to “prove” god’s existence. They say I am doing what I accuse them of doing: sticking fingers in the ears and screaming, “La-La-la! Can’t hear you!”
Well, they may have a point. I guess.
The truth is I’m not really doing this. I’m not sticking my fingers in my ears. It’s just that I’ve heard this before. Care to guess how many times I’ve been approached with the first cause argument? Or the argument from design? Or pascal’s wager? Or the ontological argument? Seriously.
I help run a student organization at my local university. One of the things we are doing now is going over these arguments that are so common; they may as well be mantras. A few of the younger members haven’t heard these before, and I want them to understand that these are not new arguments and they have been refuted by people WAY smarter than I long before I could spell atheist.
So if I cut someone off when they begin with, “Everything has a cause…” and insert immediately, “What caused god?”, it’s not that I have fingers in my ears, it’s I’ve heard this before. When they begin with, “God is the greatest thing we can imagine…” and I cut them off with, “So you admit god is imaginary,” I just want to skip the long explanation I know is coming. And when they fall back to, “What if you’re wrong?”, I just smile and ask, “What if you’re wrong about Zeus?”
It’s not that I know everything. It is completely possible that there is an argument out there I’ve not heard and will actually have to consider. Thus far, that has not happened.
Oh, and back to my student group: We entertained briefly the idea of having “mock debates” where one of us would take the opposing side and argue for it. We wanted to be sure we were not attacking strawmen and that the actual arguments were justly represented. But when this came to practice, we couldn’t figure out how to do it in a way that would not at least appear that we were attacking strawmen. So we just present the argument and refute it in a discussion.
Comment by Ash on February 15, 2011 at 11:24pm
Comment by Mario Rodgers on February 15, 2011 at 11:51pm
Comment by Ava Wilson on February 16, 2011 at 2:49am
Comment by Jonel Burge on February 16, 2011 at 5:04am I will quote Tim Minchin here--
“You’re so sure of your position
But you’re just closed-minded
I think you’ll find
Your faith in Science and Tests
Is just as blind
As the faith of any fundamentalist”
“Hm that’s a good point, let me think for a bit
Oh wait, my mistake, it’s absolute bullshit.
Science adjusts it’s beliefs based on what’s observed
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved.
If you show me
That, say, homeopathy works,
Then I will change my mind
I’ll spin on a fucking dime
I’ll be embarrassed as hell,
But I will run through the streets yelling
It’s a miracle! Take physics and bin it!
Water has memory!
And while it’s memory of a long lost drop of onion juice is Infinite
It somehow forgets all the poo it’s had in it!
You show me that it works and how it works
And when I’ve recovered from the shock
I will take a compass and carve Fancy That on the side of my cock.”
http://podblack.com/2008/12/little-kitten-lyrics-to-tim-minchins-st...
Yeah, that sums it up for me.
You show me that it works, and how it works, and when I've recovered from the shock, I will take a compass and carve 'Fancy That' on the side of my cock.
For anyone who complains that you act like you "know it all", it's because guess what, you do. But should tomorrow, we find out that atoms are held together by tiny clothespins and not electrical charges, guess what? we adjust to that, but we will want to see how and why, rather than just accepting it. We have questions, they have been answered, and these are the rational answers. No, there's no proof for jesus or the bible, but I think
Comment by Mr. Anderson on February 16, 2011 at 7:47am @Jonel Burge
That poem came to mind too. Total genius, is that man!
Comment by Ash on February 16, 2011 at 11:20am I love Tim Minchin.
@ Ava. I see nothing wrong with debating Atheists as aggressively or even more so than theists. You and another Atheist may actually be open minded enough to learn something from your disagreement. I know I have by talking with (debating?) other Atheists. Some of the best discussions our non-religious group had in college is where our group split on an idea and we could argue it out with other people who were willing to change their minds, if they were so convinced.
Comment
Started by Rick Yost in Religion and the Religious, Atheism and Atheists. Last reply by Alma Araceli 13 minutes ago. 2 Replies 0 Likes
Posted by Rob Klaers on June 17, 2013 at 2:00am 5 Comments 3 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!
Join Think Atheist