dear Mr. maniacally-raving-mad-

repugnican-

representative

Daugaard,

if a kid in your school has a gun &

your teacher has a gun,

and the teacher fires first,

or the kid fires first &

somebody misses &

hits other kids

promoting a domino effect of a

bloodbath,

will you think then

that the idea of

putting guns in the hands of

teachers,

might’ve been the

wrong motherfucking way to go?

not quite with me yet, asshole?

hmmm…

how about if your armed teacher has

a problem with an unarmed student one day &

s/he got dumped the night before,

came in drunk, may have a temper problem

that slid under the radar…or maybe,

just maybe, they are fucking nutbags

themselves…

now that teacher pulls the trigger,

because you know what…being a teacher

wasn’t really what they had wanted to be

all their lives…instead,

they just wanted to make a mark,

secretly &

now is the time which they’ve chosen to do so…

will you regret making South Dakota the first

fucking hick state,

DUMB ENOUGH,

to arm their teaching staff

(that is, ON THE BOOKS…

yes, we know that there are dumb hick

schools out there that have already allowed

cowboy teachers to strut their stuff off the

books with guns…)?

still not with me, fuckstick?

let’s put it in a little equation for you…

kid with a gun + a teacher with a gun

DOES NOT EQUAL

LESS GUNS IN SCHOOLS.

kid with a gun + a teacher with a gun

DOES NOT EQUAL

LESS VIOLENCE IN SCHOOLS.

teacher with a gun + students without guns

EQUALS

GODDAMNED

FEARMONGERING &

ALL THE MORE REASON FOR A KID TO

BRING A GUN TO SCHOOL.