Shutter Island: You invest 2.5 hours and get 3 minutes in return

U.S. Marshalls go to Shutter Island, a mental hospital for the
criminally insane, to find an escaped prisoner and stumble across a
bigger mystery. Brief, but frequent moments of shoddy writing and
cinematography damage the experience of what might have otherwise been
a memorable and insightful film.

United States Marshalls Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Chuck
Aule (Mark Ruffalo) are dispatched to Shutter Island to investigate the
disappearance of a patient who seems to have evaporated into thin air.
Doctor Cawley (Ben Kingsley) shows them around, tells them about the
facility and the patient, but seems to be hiding his true motives.
While on the island, some of Teddy’s personal and war experiences come
to the surface, affecting his ability to investigate effectively. A
storm, both environmental and emotional, overtakes the grounds and
reveals some painful truths.

Shutter Island has introspective moments that could shine lights on
long forgotten skeletons in anyone’s closet. Sadly, just as one might
be forced to ask themselves hard questions, the light goes out.
Occasionally, it is because the writing or execution of the lines is
unnatural. Even more frustrating are the dollar store green screen
visuals.
Director Martin Scorsese and director of photography Robert Richardson
pay meticulous attention to the lighting, framing and shadow in Shutter
Island. Each location is lit to draw the viewers attention where the
director wants it, where the story demands it be, and creates a deeply
entrenching mood for the audience.

Then out of nowhere, while the audience is sitting obediently in the
visual trench Scorsese dug for us, he throws dirt on our heads. The
carefully lit scenery is replaced by green screen effects that would be
rejected by the producer of any late night show. There are a few dream
or fantasy sequences that are technically well done but leave the
audience scratching their heads. Occasionally, Scorsese pays better
attention to how the scene looks than how it is acted or written and it
distracts from the overall film.

Much of Shutter Island relies on the relationship between Teddy and
Chuck. For the most part, their relationship, streams smoothly across
the screen. Just as you buy into the silky ride, Leonardo DiCaprio,
Mark Ruffalo, and writer Laeta Kalogridis throw tires onto the road.
They aren’t interesting; they are the nuisances of bad acting and
unpolished writing. The phraseology used by Teddy is inconsistent and
bizarre. Even when Teddy‘s dialogue is written within the believable
range, DiCaprio occasionally overacts relatively tame scenes. Ruffalo
and DiCaprio’s consistency lack chemistry or sincerity. As the film
progresses, the nature of their relationship changes, but the feeling
between them does not.

My biggest frustration when I reached the end of Shutter Island is that
I never feel attached to the characters. The use of fantasy and the
obvious secrets throughout the story made me feel like the filmmakers
were keeping me at an uncomfortable distance.

Even given all the problems, Shutter Island does leave the audience
with something to think and talk about at the end. For those of us who
have skeletons hung amongst our skinny jeans, the ending may give pause
and may even force introspection. My husband and I discussed the
ending and its meaning for nearly two hours.

Shutter Island’s pay off did not feel worth the two and a half hour
investment of my time. We can ask ourselves the same question and have
the same honest discussion without the context of Shutter Island’s
story. There is little, besides the last three minutes of the film, to
really grasp onto as powerful, entertaining or interesting. It might
be good for a discussion group but barring that, it has little to offer
a general audience.

Views: 6

Comment by Dan on February 23, 2010 at 5:39am
Yeah well, I liked it. Great write up LeRae!

You forgot to include "Mindfuck",though. It suckered me into it.
Comment by Leis Becraft on February 23, 2010 at 8:48am
I enjoyed the film as well. I'm no great writer but my review of the film would be much different.
Comment by Shine on February 23, 2010 at 10:48am
Hmm, I think that I still might have to see it in the theatre just for the cinematography. I was afraid that it was getting too built up in the press, though.

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

Forum

Awe struck

Started by Davis Goodman in Small Talk. Last reply by Virgil 47 minutes ago. 24 Replies

The Shinto Flower among the Weeds of Religion

Started by Cato Rigas in Advice. Last reply by Ward Cressin 6 hours ago. 7 Replies

In Defense of ‘Islamophobia’

Started by Brian Daurelle in Society. Last reply by Erock68la 8 hours ago. 46 Replies

Blog Posts

A Life-Changing Confrontation

Posted by Belle Rose on October 23, 2014 at 2:55am 2 Comments

Life Condensed

Posted by Cato Rigas on October 19, 2014 at 8:30pm 3 Comments

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service