Oldest "Human" Skeleton Found--Disproves "Missing Link"

Oldest "Human" Skeleton Found--Disproves "Missing Link"
from National Geographic News

Jamie Shreeve (Science editor, National Geographic magazine) - October 1, 2009

Scientists today announced the discovery of the oldest fossil skeleton of a human ancestor. The find reveals that our forebears underwent a previously unknown stage of evolution more than a million years before Lucy, the iconic early human ancestor specimen that walked the Earth 3.2 million years ago. The centerpiece of a treasure trove of new fossils, the skeleton—assigned to a species called Ardipithecus ramidus—belonged to a small-brained, 110-pound (50-kilogram) female nicknamed "Ardi."

The fossil puts to rest the notion, popular since Darwin's time, that a chimpanzee-like missing link—resembling something between humans and today's apes—would eventually be found at the root of the human family tree. Indeed, the new evidence suggests that the study of chimpanzee anatomy and behavior—long used to infer the nature of the earliest human ancestors—is largely irrelevant to understanding our beginnings.

Ardi instead shows an unexpected mix of advanced characteristics and of primitive traits seen in much older apes that were unlike chimps or gorillas. As such, the skeleton offers a window on what the last common ancestor of humans and living apes might have been like.

Announced at joint press conferences in Washington, D.C., and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, the analysis of the Ardipithecus ramidus bones will be published in a collection of papers tomorrow in a special edition of the journal Science, along with an avalanche of supporting materials published online.

"This find is far more important than Lucy," said Alan Walker, a paleontologist from Pennsylvania State University who was not part of the research. "It shows that the last common ancestor with chimps didn't look like a chimp, or a human, or some funny thing in between."

Ardi Surrounded by Family

The Ardipithecus ramidus fossils were discovered in Ethiopia's harsh Afar desert at a site called Aramis in the Middle Awash region, just 46 miles (74 kilometers) from where Lucy's species, Australopithecus afarensis, was found in 1974. Radiometric dating of two layers of volcanic ash that tightly sandwiched the fossil deposits revealed that Ardi lived 4.4 million years ago.

Older hominid fossils have been uncovered, including a skull from Chad at least six million years old and some more fragmentary, slightly younger remains from Kenya and nearby in the Middle Awash.

While important, however, none of those earlier fossils are nearly as revealing as the newly announced remains, which in addition to Ardi's partial skeleton include bones representing at least 36 other individuals.

"All of a sudden you've got fingers and toes and arms and legs and heads and teeth," said Tim White of the University of California, Berkeley, who co-directed the work with Berhane Asfaw, a paleoanthropologist and former director of the National Museum of Ethiopia, and Giday WoldeGabriel, a geologist at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.

"That allows you to do something you can't do with isolated specimens," White said. "It allows you to do biology."

Ardi's Weird Way of Moving

The biggest surprise about Ardipithecus's biology is its bizarre means of moving about.

All previously known hominids—members of our ancestral lineage—walked upright on two legs, like us. But Ardi's feet, pelvis, legs, and hands suggest she was a biped on the ground but a quadruped when moving about in the trees.

Her big toe, for instance, splays out from her foot like an ape's, the better to grasp tree limbs. Unlike a chimpanzee foot, however, Ardipithecus's contains a special small bone inside a tendon, passed down from more primitive ancestors, that keeps the divergent toe more rigid. Combined with modifications to the other toes, the bone would have helped Ardi walk bipedally on the ground, though less efficiently than later hominids like Lucy. The bone was lost in the lineages of chimps and gorillas.

According to the researchers, the pelvis shows a similar mosaic of traits. The large flaring bones of the upper pelvis were positioned so that Ardi could walk on two legs without lurching from side to side like a chimp. But the lower pelvis was built like an ape's, to accommodate huge hind limb muscles used in climbing.

Even in the trees, Ardi was nothing like a modern ape, the researchers say.

Modern chimps and gorillas have evolved limb anatomy specialized to climbing vertically up tree trunks, hanging and swinging from branches, and knuckle-walking on the ground.

While these behaviors require very rigid wrist bones, for instance, the wrists and finger joints of Ardipithecus were highly flexible. As a result Ardi would have walked on her palms as she moved about in the trees—more like some primitive fossil apes than like chimps and gorillas.

"What Ardi tells us is there was this vast intermediate stage in our evolution that nobody knew about," said Owen Lovejoy, an anatomist at Kent State University in Ohio, who analyzed Ardi's bones below the neck. "It changes everything."

Against All Odds, Ardi Emerges

The first, fragmentary specimens of Ardipithecus were found at Aramis in 1992 and published in 1994. The skeleton announced today was discovered that same year and excavated with the bones of the other individuals over the next three field seasons. But it took 15 years before the research team could fully analyze and publish the skeleton, because the fossils were in such bad shape.

After Ardi died, her remains apparently were trampled down into mud by hippos and other passing herbivores. Millions of years later, erosion brought the badly crushed and distorted bones back to the surface.

They were so fragile they would turn to dust at a touch. To save the precious fragments, White and colleagues removed the fossils along with their surrounding rock. Then, in a lab in Addis, the researchers carefully tweaked out the bones from the rocky matrix using a needle under a microscope, proceeding "millimeter by submillimeter," as the team puts it in Science. This process alone took several years.

Pieces of the crushed skull were then CT-scanned and digitally fit back together by Gen Suwa, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Tokyo.

In the end, the research team recovered more than 125 pieces of the skeleton, including much of the feet and virtually all of the hands—an extreme rarity among hominid fossils of any age, let alone one so very ancient.

"Finding this skeleton was more than luck," said White. "It was against all odds."

Ardi's World

The team also found some 6,000 animal fossils and other specimens that offer a picture of the world Ardi inhabited: a moist woodland very different from the region's current, parched landscape. In addition to antelope and monkey species associated with forests, the deposits contained forest-dwelling birds and seeds from fig and palm trees.

Wear patterns and isotopes in the hominid teeth suggest a diet that included fruits, nuts, and other forest foods.

If White and his team are right that Ardi walked upright as well as climbed trees, the environmental evidence would seem to strike the death knell for the "savanna hypothesis"—a long-standing notion that our ancestors first stood up in response to their move onto an open grassland environment.

Sex for Food

Some researchers, however, are unconvinced that Ardipithecus was quite so versatile.

"This is a fascinating skeleton, but based on what they present, the evidence for bipedality is limited at best," said William Jungers, an anatomist at Stony Brook University in New York State.

"Divergent big toes are associated with grasping, and this has one of the most divergent big toes you can imagine," Jungers said. "Why would an animal fully adapted to support its weight on its forelimbs in the trees elect to walk bipedally on the ground?"

One provocative answer to that question—originally proposed by Lovejoy in the early 1980s and refined now in light of the Ardipithecus discoveries—attributes the origin of bipedality to another trademark of humankind: monogamous sex.

Virtually all apes and monkeys, especially males, have long upper canine teeth—formidable weapons in fights for mating opportunities.

But Ardipithecus appears to have already embarked on a uniquely human evolutionary path, with canines reduced in size and dramatically "feminized" to a stubby, diamond shape, according to the researchers. Males and female specimens are also close to each other in body size.

Lovejoy sees these changes as part of an epochal shift in social behavior: Instead of fighting for access to females, a male Ardipithecus would supply a "targeted female" and her offspring with gathered foods and gain her sexual loyalty in return.

To keep up his end of the deal, a male needed to have his hands free to carry home the food. Bipedalism may have been a poor way for Ardipithecus to get around, but through its contribution to the "sex for food" contract, it would have been an excellent way to bear more offspring. And in evolution, of course, more offspring is the name of the game.

Two hundred thousand years after Ardipithecus, another species called Australopithecus anamensis appeared in the region. By most accounts, that species soon evolved into Australopithecus afarensis, with a slightly larger brain and a full commitment to a bipedal way of life. Then came early Homo, with its even bigger brain and budding tool use.

Did primitive Ardipithecus undergo some accelerated change in the 200,000 years between it and Australopithecus—and emerge as the ancestor of all later hominids? Or was Ardipithecus a relict species, carrying its quaint mosaic of primitive and advanced traits with it into extinction?

Study co-leader White sees nothing about the skeleton "that would exclude it from ancestral status." But he said more fossils would be needed to fully resolve the issue.

Stony Brook's Jungers added, "These finds are incredibly important, and given the state of preservation of the bones, what they did was nothing short of heroic.

But this is just the beginning of the story."

Photos

In 1994 a research team led by Tim White of the University of California, Berkeley; Berhane Asfaw, former director of the National Museum of Ethiopia; and Giday WoldeGabriel of the Los Alamos National Laboratory announced the discovery of the first fossils of a new human ancestor, Ardipithecus ramidus. The researchers presented tantalizing evidence that the species was a biped living in woodland conditions more than a million years before the famous "Lucy" fossil of the species Australopithecus afarensis.

The research, to be published in an October 2, 2009, special issue of the journal Science, reveals that our earliest ancestors underwent a previously unknown phase of evolution, shedding new light on the nature of the last common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans.

An artist's reconstruction of the face of Ardipithecus ramidus was made possible by a digital reconstruction of skull parts from two individuals. The face of "Ardi" did not project as much as those of modern apes, but was not as flat and massive as the later australopithecines. Researchers who studied the species suggest this difference is related to the small size of the species' incisor teeth compared to those of chimps. Based on the relatively small size of its brow ridge and canine teeth, scientists suggest this fossil is of a female.

What did our earliest known ancestors look like? The skeletal material associated with Ardipithecus ramidus now provides the best evidence. "Ardi" stood about 47 inches (120 centimeters) tall and weighed about 110 pounds (50 kilograms).

While A. ramidus was quite apelike in appearance, as this artist's reconstruction shows, researchers who studied the fossil skeleton suggest the species lacked the adaptations of living apes for climbing vertically, hanging from branches, and walking on its knuckles. Instead, it was a "careful climber" in the trees, and supported its weight on the palms of its hands while using its divergent big toe for grasping.

In addition to the partial skeleton found in 1994, bone fragments of at least 35 other Ardipithecus ramidus individuals were excavated at the Aramis site in the Middle Awash region of the Afar Depression in Ethiopia.

Under the direction of the scientists, paleoartist Jay Matternes was able to draw a complete skeleton of the hominid, revealing a previously unknown blend of traits for "careful climbing" in the trees, such as the opposable big toe and long, curved fingers, as well as walking bipedally on the ground, such as the shape of the upper pelvis.

The hands of the new ancestor were not evolved for knuckle-walking like chimps and gorillas, and their feet were more like those of Old World monkeys, which have feet that are more rigid and provide a better lever for walking.

A. ramidus (artist's reconstruction, center) was adapted both to climbing in the trees and walking on the ground, according to researchers who studied its fossils. In this illustration, a reconstruction of A. ramidus appears between a silhouette of a chimpanzee (left) and one of Australopithecus afarensis, all scaled to be the same height.

While its massive forearms and long, curved fingers show A. ramidus was a climber, the upper portion of its pelvis had evolved away from an apelike condition to accommodate strong muscles that assisted in walking upright. This more human-like pelvis shape can be seen in later human ancestors, such as Australopithecus afarensis.

The lower part of A. ramidus's pelvis, however, retained an apelike condition, probably to accommodate strong leg muscles still useful for climbing.

This row of images shows the male canine condition of Ardipithecus ramidus (center digital image) intermediate in size between humans (left) and chimpanzees. The reduced size of canine teeth is an indication of a shift in social behavior away from male-male aggression, and is one of the hallmarks of the human lineage.

Finding the trait in Ardipithecus suggests that a social structure involving more cooperation between males evolved very early after the divergence between the chimpanzee and human lineages. A. ramidus' molars and premolars were small compared to those of later australopithecines and had thinner enamel, reflecting differences in diet.

So fragile they would turn to dust at a touch, the bones of the A. ramidus skeleton took 15 years to extricate from their surrounding rock, analyze, and compare with those of other individuals of the species found in the same deposits.

"Ardi," the nickname for the newly revealed A. ramidus skeleton, predates "Lucy," the well-known Australopithecus afarensis fossil, by more than a million years.

Additional Pictures from Science



Views: 310

Tags: Ardi, Ardipithecus, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus anamensis, Lucy

Comment by Morgan Matthew on October 1, 2009 at 2:03pm
This is great news as always! :] Very exciting!
Comment by Johnny on October 1, 2009 at 4:35pm
Yeah, the title is rather stupid. Then a couple paragraphs in it takes an odd poke at Darwin, for something that isn't necessarily just his notion. The rest seems fairly well presented though. It does seem shameful that even National Geographic has resorted to some sensationalizing.
Comment by Gaytor on October 1, 2009 at 6:07pm
They do have to dumb down the news for American "understanding".

I love that the big toe stuck out to the side showing arboreal traits transitioning to terrestrial with Lucy's toe being straight forward. Slow, Steady, predictable progression.
Comment by Nix Manes on October 2, 2009 at 12:07am
This is the perfect event to coincide with 150th anniversary of Darwin's Origin of Species! The timing couldn't have been better.

Fundies will be buying blood pressure medication by the pound for the next few months, but that's the price they'll have to pay for sticking with a god delusion that looks increasingly silly with each passing year. They'll scream, yell and quote bible verses for their own twisted comfort, but the rest of us will continue to learn about our history and be glad to have increased the level of knowledge about ourselves.

Let's tell them, "The party's over here! Come and join us in a toast to the continuing search for knowledge. It's cool to be chasing after knowlege. Really."
Comment by Shawn Truesdell on October 2, 2009 at 4:44am
Great news, but I have to agree that the religious nuts are going to simply read the title and start spouting "See Darwin was wrong!".
Comment by Johnny on October 2, 2009 at 3:48pm
Comment by Pagan Rose on October 3, 2009 at 3:51am
I'm new here and it's a joy to read something in an online social network that not only genuinely interests me but is intellectually stimulating, thanks.
Comment by a7 on October 11, 2009 at 4:07pm
I ma glad I read the article and the responses, will put in good stead when my fundie friend emails me this news from their point of view.

George
Comment by Johnny on October 12, 2009 at 10:24am
So I'm watching the the "Discovering Ardi" special on the Discovery Channel; not done with it yet, but I've got a better understanding of where they took the "Darwin was wrong" wording. I still think it was poorly done for them to present a headline like that, and even worse to not expound on it in the article.

Previously the line of thinking was that we evolved from some form of ancient chimpanzee; a common ancestor with modern chimpanzees. This has been the theory proposed by Darwin, and accepted by science since. What Ardi brings to light is that our common ancestor with chimps was not some form of ancient chimpanzee. We still share a common ancestor, but that ancestor is no longer thought to be an 'ancient chimpanzee.'

The show premiered Sunday night, but looks like its re-running quite a lot over the next few weeks, so if you're interested I'd recommend trying to catch it.
Comment by Johnny on October 12, 2009 at 12:50pm
Thanks for re-linking PZ's take Nelson; I had meant to read it when you linked it before, and somehow lost it in the shuffle. His points are excellent. The end of his article is very interesting too, because in "Discovering Ardi" they elude to the hypothesis that the common ancestor may have been a biped and then chimp ancestors evolved for more tree dwelling, while Ardi's ancestors continued evolving as a ground dwelling, upright biped.

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service