Muslims vs. Christians....the american bias continues...

Isn't it funny how americans, especially of the christian sect, like to view all muslims as "islamic radicals"? in light of the recent events in Boston, of which i am whole-heartedly sympathetic toward (yet we ATHEISTS HAVE NO HEART NOR MORALS i am told), i am drawn back to this argument of which i have heard others in the major media outlets sometimes talk about.  When a christian, especially an american christian, thinks of a muslim, they USUALLY think of them as an islamic radical who will blow anyone and everyone up at the slightest provocation, or no provocation at all.  They tend to think of any muslim as a terrorist, and to belong to an islamic sect is parallel to being a terrorist.  Yet when viewed in reverse, being a christian doesnt make you a klu klux klan member, yet most klan members are christians, and hold the bible as close as their torture instruments, namely a rope (if i may be so vulgar).  So why is it that these so called christians, these seemingly humble and subservient god-fearing americans, can never hold to their sacred views in practice?  do unto others as you would have them do unto you and the rest of the garbage they spew out.  All of us Atheists are who we are for a reason, and those reasons vary, but the funny thing is is that we tend to view all others as equal, until they do/say something to make them un-equal.  and even though this is a major premise of the christian faith, we all know how they only use their premises toward other christians, and not to the masses as their platforms suggest.  So here is my question for comment, since debate is pretty useless in this one sided argument, "why is it ok for christians to be christians with their multitude of sects which torture, maim, and terrorize others while hiding behind their faiths; yet those same christians are ok with vilifying all muslims and view them as terrorists"?  and i understand than im asking a bunch of atheists to comment on religious people and their views, yet i have seen this attitude spill out of the christian sects into mainstream thought and practice, both religious and non religious americans alike are guilty.  I tend to view any person as a person first, and a monster only after they exhibit monstous views or acts.  I watched the boston bombing coverage across a number of media outlets, although i watch MSNBC more than most due to their democratic leanings and (normally) non biased views.  Almost every FOX NEWS outlet was just barely holding back the "its al-queda" that was dangerously dripping from the tips of their hateful tongues, even before the pictures were released or any information actually that would show any tinge of who these mad bombers were.  And even if they were islamic, who says they are "islamic radicals"?  im sure there are christians who temporarily freak out, yet are not klan members or christian radicals, but just had a bad day or year and decided to blow some people up.  So if you would be so kind, as my fellows on this site usually are so much, to respond to my initial question buried up there somewhere, "why is it ok to be a christian and have radical psycho's in your religion and not to be a muslim who happens to just like the islamic faith"? 

i know most people here will say its not ok to be ANY religious individual, but no matter how valid our arguments are, and they ARE lol, its not the matter at hand.  from a objectively unbiased view, since you should neither be muslim nor christian and be on this site i believe, how in your views is it ok for these americans to be so biased in THEIR views of other faiths, when theirs is so fucked up internally its laughable on the point of being insane? and yes, they are insane overall, but i just want comments on this view of muslim vs christian.  thanks, ~rookie~

Views: 529

Comment by Pope Beanie on May 26, 2013 at 8:32pm

Well Unseen, I think my "Crusades" cliche beats your eggs cliche. But these are matters of degrees.

So, too, are there degrees of adherence to Geneva Conventions. How about Gitmo? My point being that we, who claim to have the high ground on morality, are not speaking from integrity as much as we could. We, too, often compromise our morals and values, at the cost of other, innocents, and then claim we were justified.

Comment by Unseen on May 26, 2013 at 10:41pm

@Keith Konecny 

as a matter of FACT, i querried over 667(meaning 668 lol) christians from 3 local TOLEDO OHIO super churches, and hid the question among others concerning faith.

So, these super churches...how do they divide up in terms of denominations? How many Catholics, how many Presbyterians, Methodists, Episcopals, Baptists, etc.?

Comment by Logicallunatic on May 27, 2013 at 8:05am

Not all Muslims are terrorists but quite a lot of terrorists are Muslim. I guess that makes me a racist-crusading-Islamophobe. 

Comment by Unseen on May 27, 2013 at 9:44am

@Keith Konecny

What I was getting at is that when you say "super churches" (I'll leave you to define what that means), I suspect you selected fairly conservative fundamentalist churches.

Also, I suppose I have to admit that when I hear the word "Muslim" it is the terrorism that comes to mind first, but so what? It doesn't follow that I believe all Muslims are terrorists. In fact, I know most are not. So what's your point?

Comment by archaeopteryx on May 27, 2013 at 11:35am

While I agree that Americans all too often generalize, in this video, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a former Muslim, presents an interesting perspective on her former faith:

Comment by Keith Konecny on May 27, 2013 at 5:44pm

you made my point in your comment, when you say that when you think of muslims your first thought springs toward terrorist. thats all this whole post was about, so thank you for your imput. i look at people as people first, until your actions define you, regardless of your personal beliefs. it goes deeper than religion also, it goes to the heart of americans feeling they are superior to everyone and everything. whether thats true ill leave to others, but it opens a whole  new ball game of questions.

Comment by Unseen on May 27, 2013 at 5:52pm

I call shenanigans. Isn't it you who wrote...

When a christian, especially an american christian, thinks of a muslim, they USUALLY think of them as an islamic radical who will blow anyone and everyone up at the slightest provocation, or no provocation at all. 

I did say that that thought does come to mind first, but that that isn't how I define Muslims and I'm well aware that most of them are not terrorists. So actually, even though you want to deny it through the big lie technique, I was contradicting the point you made there.

BTW, you still haven't told me about the religious demographics of the Christians you supposedly polled. Also, I'm curious about your methods. How did you gather your information? Did you pass questionnaires up the pews or stand outside the church and stop people exiting? How many responses did you base your conclusion on?

Comment by archaeopteryx on May 27, 2013 at 6:07pm

Keith, there are those who are religious, and then there are those who define themselves by their religion, and when their religion is a religion of death - i.e., a belief that life on Earth has no significance, it is the life after death (which doesn't exist) that is the only thing that is important, those people are ripe candidates for terrorism, if they can be convinced, and they've already proved they are sheeple, that an act of terrorism in this life will bring great rewards in the (non-existent) next. Islam is the only religion that fulfills all of those requirements.

Comment by Keith Konecny on May 27, 2013 at 6:41pm

wow, awful testy on this memorial day are we not? they are multi faith churches which seemed the only way to go, i wont say which ones although i did say the region.  and yes it was exit polling done by high school kids paid to act like they belonged to the church itself, so as to get as true a response as possible.  i asked a range of holy trinity questions, household religion questions, tv programming questions and the like.  they either answered immediately or a few mailed them to a po box. does that help? i would like to say more, but then the writing im doing would tend to be tedious and unsatisfying, since it is part of my underlying premise.  and i only wrote this above to get responses and spark debate, which is what i meant earlier by thanks.  so thanks.

Comment by _Robert_ on May 27, 2013 at 6:52pm

"You see son, many years ago the religious killed each other off and us atheists inherited the earth."

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

Forum

Sunday Disassembly

Started by Reg The Fronkey Farmer in Society. Last reply by Unseen 4 minutes ago. 12 Replies

Awe struck

Started by Davis Goodman in Small Talk. Last reply by Unseen 13 hours ago. 40 Replies

where when how who why ?

Started by aubrey knows nothing * in Small Talk. Last reply by Davis Goodman 13 hours ago. 5 Replies

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service