Is government a more powerful force than love?

I didn't join this site to take other people's words out of my mouth.

I attempted to emphasize the importance of love amid the current trend of legalized gay marriage. I'm not anonymous, so anyone can go to Facebook to verify my support of my gay friends' new marriage intentions.

Marriage is a much older religious institution than a governmental one, and marriage is younger than love. Tell me ThinkAtheist, does law matter more than love?

Views: 221

Tags: andy, atheist, gay, hoke, law, lgbt, love, marraige, religion

Comment by Gallup's Mirror on May 25, 2014 at 3:32am

I attempted to emphasize the importance of love amid the current trend of legalized gay marriage.

As I write this, you have yet to mention (let alone emphasize) love in the other thread. Not once. Your first and only statement on the subject of "legalized gay marriage" was:

"I'm glad that the LGBT community is excited [about the good prospects for future Supreme Court rulings on same-sex marriage]. However, I urge the excited to care less about what government and religion care about your lives. Religion and government are merely temporary popular traditions."

You could post in the old thread and elaborate to clarify a point poorly expressed in haste or express regrets for putting both feet in your mouth.

But no.

Instead, you're starting a new thread, changing the subject, and falsely restating your inane comment from the old thread, where you're tacitly defending it by blaming others.

Not too impressive, Andy.

Comment by Strega on May 25, 2014 at 11:32am
You're comparing apples and pears, Andy. Love is an emotion and laws are a man made construct. You might as easily compare happiness to a watch mechanism. What points of reference would you compare to assess the merits of the two disparate items you selected?

Love gave me my wife. Laws have now changed to enable me to cohabit ate with her. I am really at a loss as to what underlying point you are trying to make. Love wasn't enough to allow cohabitation, we needed laws to change to enable our love to flourish.
Comment by Oluwa-Shola Aiyenuro on May 25, 2014 at 11:25pm

They preach Love, and yet deny some people the right to love and be happy. No man has right to hold a person's personal freedom. I believe everyone do what they like and how they do it shouldn;t be anyone;s business.  I support what ever makes the couples happy.  Because that where they all find own peace of mind.

Comment by Andy Hoke on May 26, 2014 at 12:57am

I'm currently operating at a surplus of ignoratio elenchi.

Again, I find myself curious. I'm a little confused by, yet interested in the thoughts of others. Under these circumstances, I am inclined to perform some research, which consists in part by asking questions. Call it sociology.

I ask a question, and I attract ire. They say that philosophy is questions which may not be answered, and religion is answers that may not be questioned.

Apparently I have been questioning answers which may not be questioned.

In an attempt to emphasize the importance of love in the human experience, I advocated what I believe to be humanity's greatest quality. My bad.

It seems I have confused atheists with freethinkers.

I'll probably weigh in for a few minutes once a week through the summer (whether you like it or not), then I am done with this 'community'. If this group isn't that interested in love and the quality of life for humans, if this group worships law and substitutes Al Gore for John the Baptist, I really can't see this site as a terribly good use of my time. It's a big internet.

I know that homosexuals have a cause to celebrate. What government now makes of this religious institution is a big deal to you, right? That's cool, I'm happy for you, but to celebrate a religious institution seems fairly odd on an 'atheist' website. Just sayin'.

Comment by Gallup's Mirror on May 26, 2014 at 5:36am

I'm currently operating at a surplus of ignoratio elenchi.

You do operate by distracting from the issue at hand, piling on one irrelevancy after another.

In this case, the issue is that every state ban on same-sex marriage is being challenged in court, and every ban ruled upon has been struck down, setting up a probable 'final showdown' in the US Supreme Court.

At hand is your comment that it's nothing to get "excited" about: urging LGBT people to "care less" about government and religion in their lives. You started this new thread on the basis of that comment.

Again, I find myself curious. I'm a little confused by, yet interested in the thoughts of others. Under these circumstances, I am inclined to perform some research, which consists in part by asking questions. Call it sociology. I ask a question, and I attract ire. They say that philosophy is questions which may not be answered, and religion is answers that may not be questioned. Apparently I have been questioning answers which may not be questioned.

Is government a more powerful force than love? Are police more powerful than disgust? Are your emotions greater than the military? What is the purpose of a mountain?

You attract ire because you attack others falsely ("It seems I have confused atheists with freethinkers!") for correctly pointing out your own shortcomings, such as failing to be clear or asking meaningless questions that are irrelevant to the topic at hand.

In an attempt to emphasize the importance of love in the human experience, I advocated what I believe to be humanity's greatest quality. My bad.

You offhandedly belittled LGBT people and their legal rights. Now you're falsely portraying that as "attempting to emphasize the importance of love" and saying the valid criticism you got comes from lack of interest "in love and the quality of life for humans".

Yeah. That's bad, Andy.

I'll probably weigh in for a few minutes once a week through the summer (whether you like it or not), then I am done with this 'community'. If this group isn't that interested in love and the quality of life for humans, if this group worships law and substitutes Al Gore for John the Baptist, I really can't see this site as a terribly good use of my time. It's a big internet.

By all means, weigh in. It's a symbiotic relationship.

Our community provides the government worship, Al Gore baptisms, poor freethinking, disdain for humanity's greatest quality (love), and disallowing of questions.

You provide opportunities to demonstrate your assertions of willful ignorance, intellectual dishonesty, anti-science, flawed reasoning and poor critical thinking skills. These are teaching moments.

You're doing our readership a valuable service, Andy.

I know that homosexuals have a cause to celebrate. 

Everyone who cares about 'quality of life for humans' has cause to celebrate the end of a long standing injustice. This is the major civil rights issue of our time.

What government now makes of this religious institution is a big deal to you, right? That's cool, I'm happy for you, but to celebrate a religious institution seems fairly odd on an 'atheist' website. Just sayin'.

Marriage licenses come from the state. So do the 1,138 benefits, rights and protections that are provided on the basis of marital status under Federal law. Gay couples line up at city hall, not church, when a court strikes down a ban on same-sex marriage.

Comment by Dustin on May 26, 2014 at 9:05pm

"Tell me ThinkAtheist, does law matter more than love?"

I do not understand the question.  Am I the only one?  

If I do understand it in the way that I believe it is being asked, then I am left wondering...why does such a question ever need to be asked and for what reason?

It seems so obvious to me.   

Unless there is an underlying meaning behind the question I do not comprehend?

"Marriage is a much older religious institution than a governmental one"

Evidence?

Or do you mean when Genghis Khan has a concubine for each day of the year with leftovers to spare.  

Or Polygamy perhaps?

Or are you speaking about arranged marriages?

Comment by Davis Goodman on May 26, 2014 at 10:42pm

I'm sorry you haven't learnt anything yet about critical thinking, how to properly phrase questions, admit when you make even the slightest error, how to clarify your ideas, answer any questions anyone asks you, relent or play by the basic rules of rational discourse. I guess it's a failure on our part Andy. We didn't try hard enough.

Comment by Ed on May 27, 2014 at 1:20pm

Law versus love? Love versus law? It is a little confusing and I believe a rephrasing of the question might help those of us unsure what you're asking.

Comment by Andy Hoke on May 27, 2014 at 11:23pm

Lots of negativity in response to (what I thought) was a basic, albeit unorthodox juxtaposition.

Ok, I promise never to ask if love matters more than law on this website; the question itself is apparently profane.

Sorry that my question ruffled this community's collective feathers.

Comment by Dustin on May 28, 2014 at 1:29am

Huh!?  Profane!?  Ruffled!?  Feathers...!?

I'm sensing some trolling going on here...

And trust me, I know, cause I do like to troll - But I do my best to keep it out of this website.  I usually only do it when I am in gamer-mode.  :)

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

Events

Services we love!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

© 2015   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service