Interesting article about the supposed census registering the birth of J.H.C.

Here's an excerpt:
*There was no census of "all the world" (read: the entire Roman Empire) declared by Augustus; at least, if there were, it's not mentioned in any Roman documents that we've uncovered so far. The census was of Judea, Samaria, and Idumaea--not Galilee (where Luke puts Joseph and Mary). Quirinius used the opportunity to also conduct a census of Syria.
*The notion that each male would have to register in the home town of a remote ancestor is unbelievable. The entire Roman world would have been turned upside-down. There would surely have been records of such widespread dislocations, and there are none. Augustus was arguably the most rational of the emperors, and would never have ordered such an irrational thing.
*Ancient census-takers wanted landowners to be connected to their land, for tax purposes. The census-takers traveled, not those being taxed.
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2001/what-did-the-census-a...

Views: 0

Comment by Doug Reardon on May 3, 2009 at 9:19pm
Didn't Albert Schweitzer spend many years pouring over old roman records in a futile attempt to find evidence of Jesus' existence?
Comment by Nelson on May 5, 2009 at 5:12am
Albert Schweitzer among many others. but to be fair, Schweitzer did, and most historians today do, believe that Jesus the man existed.

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

Gizmo Gadget - Purveyros of the finest gadgets this side of the Amazon

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

Backup your stuff: Dropbox and SugarSync.

Atheist Web Hosting. TA members get 20% off
RFEHosting.com
We are in love with our Amazon
Book Store!

 

Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m

© 2013   Created by Morgan Matthew.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service