Comment by Christoffel Jacobus Bezuidenhout on June 7, 2011 at 7:01pm
Comment by IEatDinosaurMeat on June 7, 2011 at 7:49pm
Comment by oneinfinity on June 7, 2011 at 7:57pm
Comment by Caesar MacEntire on June 7, 2011 at 8:08pm This is how the "Flying Spaghetti Monster" came to be.
Have you been touched by His noodley appendage?:
Comment by IEatDinosaurMeat on June 7, 2011 at 10:07pm Dead on Adrienne, I wasn't considering that excuse to be used by ID people. However, assuming one where to learn critical thinking, logic, and other basics for responsible belief forming, I would hope it would be more difficult to find a fundamentalist believer in anything... I do recognize the is vs. ought situation that arises.
I wouldn't say your cynical, I'd call it realistic.
Comment by Grux on June 7, 2011 at 11:07pm
Comment by IEatDinosaurMeat on June 7, 2011 at 11:51pm I don't mind being called an ass, but are you saying that I'm an ass for assuming they do learn critical thinking or that they could learn critical thinking. The difference being very slim but the former would be you letting me know that my generalization that creationists are critical thinkers, which I didn't say is a generalization and not necessarily the case, whereas the latter would be you making a generalization that creationists are incapable of learning critical thinking or that to teach them critical thinking would be to give them ammunition for them to defend themselves. Either way Reductio ad absurdum is not the main purpose of this idea. It's also because equality ought to cover everything. It's a false Dichotomy to imagine the debate is between ID and Evolution, there are plenty of other cosmologies. Perhaps it was foolish to add the mythological ones but alas I am not very well studied on all cosmologies, but only a select few. Either way to imagine ID or creationism should get equal scientific study to evolution is to also admit that other cosmologies that are held by people today ought to get equal study to ID.
You are right, I am an ass.
Comment by Nathan Palo on June 8, 2011 at 12:07am This is how FSM got started. But it wouldn't be a good idea. Science should be taught in science classrooms.
I wouldn't mind at all if a comparative religion or comparative philosophy taught the basics of the major religions, and it would be perfectly appropriate, and not unconstitutional, provided it was kept as unbiased as possible. It would probably lead to a significant rise in atheism.
Comment by IEatDinosaurMeat on June 8, 2011 at 9:25am
Comment by Bryan B on June 8, 2011 at 9:37am Started by Belle Rose in Welcome to Think Atheist. Last reply by SteveInCO 9 minutes ago. 39 Replies 0 Likes
Posted by Matthew on May 20, 2013 at 8:14pm 4 Comments 0 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!
Join Think Atheist