I know, I know... Not this again. I'm sure you all are as sick of hearing this lame-ass defense as I am. However,I recently came across a new spin (new to me) on the Hitler debate. Here is what I encountered posted on a Christian forum in response to one of my posts:


In 1998 documents were released by Cornell University from the Nuremberg Trials that revealed Nazi plans to exterminate Christianity at the end of World War II The documents cover the Nuremberg trials of leading Nazis and demonstrate the deliberate genocide of Jews during the Holocaust, in which some six million Jews were killed. One senior member of the U.S. prosecution team, General William Donovan, as part of his work on documenting Nazi war crimes, compiled large amounts of documentation that the Nazis also planned to systematically destroy Christianity.


The defense is that Hitler secretly hated Christianity and, despite fairly extensive historical documentation where Hitler expresses his belief in the Christian god, his public support of Christian ideals was all just a well-calculated ruse to rid Germany of Christianity, thus Hitler couldn’t possibly have been a Christian (Catholic… for you fussy-types).


Upon investigating this further, this has become a very popular response. Has anyone encountered this before or even read the documents for themselves? Thoughts, comments, insight? No doubt there is more to this than what was posted (in terms of omitted detail).  

Views: 901

Comment by Atwas911 on December 22, 2011 at 12:00pm

That would have changed everything.. Any word on whether these txts says he planned on including the muslims too?

Had that been the case, and had i been alive at the time.. I would have enlisted in the German military.

Comment by Albert Bakker on December 22, 2011 at 12:21pm

I would have shot you on sight.

Comment by Mo Trauen on December 22, 2011 at 12:40pm

I have read that there was a secret plan presented to Hitler in a memo during the war to replace Christianity with "Hitler worship" (essentially) after the war was "won".  I even saw what purported to be a photo of the memo showing Hitler's approving comments.  I gather that Hitler was one of  those who thought Jesus was the illegitimate son of a Roman soldier and that the current Christian church was a perversion perpetrated by Paul (who was a Jew). 

This new religion would not have been a rejection of Christianity as a whole, however, and certainly not a rejection of god.  It would simply have treated Hitler as the new messiah and would have added Nazi ideas to the doctrines.






Comment by John Kelly on December 22, 2011 at 4:45pm

Hitler wasn't a Christian, I hope that we have all cleared this up.  It wasn't a lame defense.  The problem is that people just assume that any defense from their opponent is a lame defense far too often.

Also, Rutgers University did a study on this as well, and here is the NY Times article:


Look, the Nazis were planning the elimination of Christianity as early as the 1920s from what I learned from my professor who used to teach at Teubingen university in Germany.  It is imperative that people know about the "Confessing Church" and a number of the features you saw in Germany.  It doesn't make Christianity more true just because a particular line of atheist argumentation arises and is based on misinformation.  That is why only the best arguments should be used.

Comment by Mo Trauen on December 22, 2011 at 10:40pm

Being critical of and in conflict with some or all of the current christian churches does not mean that one has ceased to be a Christian.  Hitler was baptized a Catholic, confirmed, considered entering the priesthood, and died a Catholic without ever being excommunicated.

The Catholic Church knew very well what was going on in the Nazi Reich and did nothing to stop it.  Not a single Nazi leader was excommunicated, yet the pope excommunicated every single communist in the world with the stroke of a pen in 1948.  A dissident church member is still a church member until kicked out of the church.  Even then they usually still remain Christian.

What I find upsetting about this issue is the constant stream of lies from religious people who assert that Hitler was an atheist.  In such a case, I have no problem with pointing out that he was as much of a Christian as most others who call themselves Christian. 

Comment by T A A on December 23, 2011 at 1:27am

Well, I just looked into the collection index for "christians" and there's at least one document which appears to state that line mentioned by the OP.

Archive Index result. I'm just starting to read the second document... seems interesting. I haven't read it all yet, it's a 12 MB doc, but it seems on point.

So maybe someone can get in there and check it out too...

Comment by T A A on December 23, 2011 at 1:35am

To those who say this is a moot topic, IMO it isn't. There are many, too many, atheists who make claims that with more non-religious or atheist people, the world would be a more humane place, but opponents usually bring up some pretty nasty historical atheists to counter this claim. Some great crimes in history can be traced to certain individuals, other great crimes seem more systemic. I feel it is worth discussing. Unless one concludes that cruel atheist leaders were simply exceptions suffering from mentally illness, without arriving to the same conclusion in regards to religious leaders of great crimes...


You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

© 2018   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service