I think the opening statement with an apologist is by far the most important. You can cut of a large portion of the irrelevance they're capable of bringing by being careful how you word your argument.

I almost always choose to go with something simple, "My claim is that you have no proof or compelling argument for the existence of a personal god."

This cuts out a few things, it removes their ability to ask you for burden of proof on god not existing, it sounds extremely silly if they try to say, "You have no proof that I don't have proof." It also keeps the argument in the realms of a personal god rather than them using deism to get their foot in the door. It also doesn't allow them to obfuscate with the whole, "You're just angry at God," thing. The last thing I can think of is limiting the use of Pascal's Wager they'd need to bring the debate into an area they can use it, but since you've gained control it's difficult for them to steer.

Views: 35

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

Forum

What do you think of Ben Shapiro?

Started by Belle Rose in Politics. Last reply by Gregg RThomas 57 minutes ago. 11 Replies

Delete my group

Started by Adventurer in Small Talk. Last reply by Strega yesterday. 1 Reply

How ArtScience Doubts the Supernatural

Started by Stephen Nowlin in Small Talk. Last reply by Stephen Nowlin on Friday. 1 Reply

Selling Atheism

Started by David Boots in Small Talk. Last reply by Jake LaFort 17 hours ago. 14 Replies

Blog Posts

How To Be Homeless

Posted by Dan Abshear on February 26, 2017 at 3:10pm 2 Comments

Whistleblower Falls On Hard Times

Posted by Dan Abshear on February 26, 2017 at 1:40pm 0 Comments

© 2017   Created by umar.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service