Film claims discovery of nails from Jesus's cross

Just in case you haven't had your weekly dose of absurdity, here's "The Nails of the Cross" by veteran investigator Simcha Jacobovici!

 

 

JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Could two of the nails used to crucify Jesus have been discovered in a 2,000-year-old tomb in Jerusalem?

And could they have mysteriously disappeared for 20 years, only to turn up by chance in a Tel Aviv laboratory?

That is the premise of the new documentary film "The Nails of the Cross" by veteran investigator Simcha Jacobovici, which even before its release has prompted debate in the Holy Land.

The film follows three years of research during which Jacobovici presents his assertions -- some based on empirical data, others requiring much imagination and a leap of faith.

He hails the find as historic, but most experts and scholars contacted by Reuters dismissed his case as far-fetched, some calling it a publicity stunt.

Many ancient relics, including other nails supposedly traced back to the crucifixion, have been presented over the centuries as having a connection to Jesus. Many were deemed phony, while others were embraced as holy.

Jacobovici, who sparked debate with a previous film that claimed to reveal the lost tomb of Jesus, says this find differs from others because of its historical and archaeological context.

"What we are bringing to the world is the best archaeological argument ever made that two of the nails from the crucifixion of Jesus have been found," he said in an interview, wearing his trademark traditional knitted cap.

"Do I know 100 percent yes, these are them? I don't."

CONSPIRACY, SLIP-UP OR BASELESS?

The film begins by revisiting an ancient Jerusalem grave discovered in 1990 which was hailed by many at the time as the burial place of the Jewish high priest Caiaphas, who in the New Testament presides over the trial of Jesus.

The grave, along with a number of ossuaries, or bone boxes, was uncovered during construction work on a hillside a few kilometers south of the Old City. It has since been resealed.

Caiaphas is a major figure in the Gospels, having sent Jesus to the Romans and on to his death, and one of Jacobovici's assertions is that the high priest was not such a bad guy.

Two iron nails were found in the tomb, one on the ground and one actually inside an ossuary, and, according to the film, mysteriously disappeared shortly after. Jacobovici says he tracked them down to a laboratory in Tel Aviv of an anthropologist who is an expert on ancient bones.

And if they are indeed the same nails -- eaten away by rust and bent at the end, almost purposefully -- was their disappearance a conspiracy or a logistical slip-up?

No definite answer is offered.

Either way, Jacobovici shows why those nails could have been used in a crucifixion, which was a common practice two thousand years ago. He then offers his theory about why they may have been used in the most famous crucifixion in history.

"If you look at the whole story, historical, textual, archaeological, they all seem to point at these two nails being involved in a crucifixion," he said. "And since Caiaphas is only associated with Jesus's crucifixion, you put two and two together and they seem to imply that these are the nails."

The Israel Antiquities Authority, which oversaw the Jerusalem excavation, said in reaction to the film's release that it had never been proven beyond doubt that the tomb was the burial place of Caiaphas. It also said that nails are commonly found in tombs.

"There is no doubt that the talented director Simcha Jacobovici created an interesting film with a real archaeological find at its center, but the interpretation presented in it has no basis in archaeological findings or research," it said.

Views: 540

Comment by Rob McLean on April 15, 2011 at 2:46am
Let's see, there's shrouds, grails (whatever they are), bits of rotting wood, weeping statues and associated flotsam which is all "linked" to the jesus myth. Haven't these people got more productive things to spend their time on? Gees, I've got nails under eight years old that have almost rusted away to dust. Did jeesus, or his captors have access to a super duper rust killing primer? Maybe they're stainless steel, hang on, it's the Bronze-Age. I'm off to Bunnings...
Comment by John Markos O'Neill on April 15, 2011 at 3:02am
Do they have Jesus' DNA on them?
Comment by Daniel Hickey on April 15, 2011 at 3:37am
Even if they could prove that these nails belonged to a Jewish carpenter who was crucified 2000 years ago, it doesn't go to say that this Jesus guy was anything more special other than what would today have you hospitalised on grounds of insanity. "My mothers a virgin" (pre IVF days at least) "I am the son of God" "I turned that water into wine" "I can cure blindness and leprosy with a touch" are all statements that would land you in a mental facility today. So go ahead, prove these nails were involved in his crucifixion, I don't doubt the guy ever lived so I don't question the likely hood of his execution. But his existence doesn't prove that there is an Almighty God, just because 1 line in a story has a resemblance of truth to it.
Comment by Kenneth Montville D.D. on April 15, 2011 at 8:04am

1) Or they are the remains of a wooden coffin before the body decomposed and was moved to an ossuary.

2) These nails are so much smaller than the single nail we have that was actually used in a crucifixion.

3) Why would Caiaphas be buried with a relic of Jesus? That's like digging up Sen. McCarthy and finding an embroidered handkerchief that belonged to Lenin. 

4) Pretty much what Daniel Hickey said. Even if it was proved that these suspiciously small nails, found in an all but auspicious location, were proved somehow to be the nails that crucified Jesus to the cross, so what? It still fails to prove any of the supernatural claims about Jesus.

Comment by John Siqueiros on April 15, 2011 at 10:12am
Yep - this "documentary" filmmaker has put out numerous films about Jesus, with a whole lot of criticism and skepticism following his assertions. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simcha_Jacobovici.
Comment by Albert Bakker on April 15, 2011 at 11:19am

"The Israel Antiquities Authority, which oversaw the Jerusalem excavation, said in reaction to the film's release that it had never been proven beyond doubt that the tomb was the burial place of Caiaphas. It also said that nails are commonly found in tombs."

Conclusion: No there there, repetitive lameness of Jesus freak with camera. Next please.

Comment by Albert Bakker on April 15, 2011 at 11:24am
Oh, no he also found Atlantis. You can't make this stuff up.
Comment by delapruch on April 15, 2011 at 9:40pm
lol thank you Rob, John, Kasv, Daniel, Kenneth & Albert for sharing your mutual disdain & disbelief in this idiot and his nails!

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

© 2018   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service