Yesterday I attended a lecture by Ed Buckner, President of American Atheists. His lecture, titled "This Is a Free Country, Not a Christian Nation: In Freedom We Trust", was informative and provoked a few thoughtful questions from the audience.

Basically, Buckner discussed why the United States is not a Christian nation. He challenged other freethinkers to ask people who make this claim to explain what they mean by it. One could certainly argue that America has a Christian majority, but it also has a white majority, a female majority, and a majority of unmarried persons. If a nation is defined by its majority, then ours is a single white female Christian nation. You can easily understand why defining a nation by its majority does not always make sense.

Sometimes when people claim that the US is a Christian nation, they mean that it was founded on Christian principles. Buckner asks these people to point to one single word in the Constitution that expresses any Biblical idea. Similarly, he challenges them to find one passage in the Bible that grants human beings civil rights; not divine rights and rewards, but the democratic ideas founded in the Constitution (such as the freedom of speech or the freedom of religion).

Buckner went on to explain that if we look at other historical documents of our past, then we can understand why we would not want to strictly adhere to every idea put forward upon our nation’s founding. In the Mayflower Compact, for example, the governing document of the Plymouth Colony, the settlers swore to remain “loyal subjects of [their] dread Sovereign Lord King James”, and idea that would later result in revolution.

Let’s not forget that past attempts to inject Christianity into the veins of our governing body have failed throughout history.

-------------------------

Founded in 1864 by a coalition of conservative Protestant ministers, the [National Reform Association’s] top goal was to add a "Christian nation" amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The ministers were convinced that the Civil War was God's vengeance on America for omitting religious language from the Constitution, and they sought to rectify that situation.

The House of Representatives rejected the amendment in 1874 and 1896. Recommending a vote against it in 1874, the House Judiciary Committee cited "the dangers which the union between church and state had imposed upon so many nations of the Old World...."

In 1950, a brief flurry of activity temporarily resuscitated the organization, at that time based in Topeka, when Congress considered yet another "Christian nation" amendment. The proposal, introduced by Sen. Ralph Flanders, a Vermont Republican, would have added language that "devoutly recognizes the Authority and Law of Jesus Christ, Saviour and Ruler of nations, through whom are bestowed the blessings of liberty."

The new "Christian nation" amendment was an even bigger bust than its predecessors, and it was never reported out of committee. Efforts to revive it in 1961, '63 and '65 were unsuccessful.

[From Americans United]

-----------------------

Buckner’s review of these facts reminded me of this nation’s many historical myths and inaccuracies, like George Washington and the cherry tree or the idea that Christopher Columbus wanted to prove the earth is round. (Fun history bonus: the roundness of the earth was theorized since at least the time of Hellenistic Greece, and almost nobody believed in a flat earth. Columbus was never out to prove the earth was round (an idea most people already believed) and remains infamous for underestimating the size of the earth. Even if he had been out to prove the earth is round, Columbus failed miserably. Ferdinand Magellan was actually the first recorded explorer to circumnavigate the globe.)

I don’t know if it is true of citizens of other countries, but all-too-often Americans seem eager to not only pass on these historical myths, but also teach them as truth in place of real historical fact. We have a long history of sustaining flawed information just because it sounds nice. Compare this to the idea of rejecting the facts of evolution in favor of creationism – an idea almost no other nation shares in such a large majority.

Perhaps the United States remains a largely religious nation for the same reason or reasons it remains largely ignorant of historical truth.

Views: 7

Tags: america, christianity, constitution, history, myths

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

Forum

Coming Out as Humanist

Started by Barry Adamson in Religion and the Religious, Atheism and Atheists. Last reply by archaeopteryx 46 minutes ago. 18 Replies

What would happen...

Started by Griffin Buckerfield in Small Talk. Last reply by Simon Mathews 2 hours ago. 5 Replies

The Shinto Flower among the Weeds of Religion

Started by Cato Rigas in Advice. Last reply by Simon Mathews 3 hours ago. 4 Replies

Awe struck

Started by Davis Goodman in Small Talk. Last reply by Unseen 21 hours ago. 15 Replies

Blog Posts

Life Condensed

Posted by Cato Rigas on October 19, 2014 at 8:30pm 1 Comment

Cool Vehicle Inspection!

Posted by Ed on October 18, 2014 at 9:03am 2 Comments

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service