Comment by Sniz on February 3, 2009 at 2:54pm

Hehe I got 0% too. It was pretty obvious which answers would get you which results, though.

Thanks, that was fun!

Comment by April on February 3, 2009 at 6:19pm

I see you are busy at work! I'm trying very hard not to work :) I did get a 0%.

Comment by Morgan Matthew on February 4, 2009 at 12:55am

good post as usual Johnny

Comment by Liam on February 5, 2009 at 11:52am

In a God Delusion debate, the notion of morals came up and Dawkins made a very good point.

He said that most people are aware that the Bible contains some pretty awful things and that nobody in todays society would contemplate relying on them for moral teaching.

There are also some very good parts that you would.

But the point is, in order to distinguise between the good parts of the bible and the bad parts of the bible, you are using moral reasoning.

But because you are using a moral guide to select good from bad in the bible, it clearly follows that your morals are external, and the bible did not define those morals.

All you are doing is applying your inate sense of right and wrong to the bible and not the otherway around.

QED.

Good Man Richard.

Comment by Frink on February 5, 2009 at 12:48pm

zero.

Comment