I ran across this and couldn't help notice how biased this article was but even more interesting we're the comments. It's like people think atheist are angry hateful people. haha, couldnt be far from the truth http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/08/20/assault-on-christianity-in-des-moines/

Views: 5

Comment by Reggie on August 20, 2009 at 11:31pm
Well, their tagline is "News for Republicans, by Republicans". Can't say I am all that surprised by the bias.
Comment by Reggie on August 20, 2009 at 11:36pm
Oh, but the comments are great!
Comment by ANGEL TAFOYA on August 20, 2009 at 11:47pm
Thats unfortunate cause politically i have mainly conservative views, but I'm sure the Republican party wouldnt have any of me in there. hahaha
Comment by Reggie on August 20, 2009 at 11:53pm
The Republican party would consider you a RINO these days.
Comment by ANGEL TAFOYA on August 21, 2009 at 12:11am
I'd be part of the name only club haha I'm happy being independent
Comment by Reggie on August 21, 2009 at 10:20am
Yeah, you have to be with them totally or you are against them. No room for independent thought there. Further evidence that we need a strong independent party.
Comment by Dave G on August 21, 2009 at 10:31am
Multiple strong independent parties, Reggie. Personally, I think that both the Republicans (who I honestly hope will finally self-destruct, cease to be a major party at all, and give way to a new, less rabidly insane conservative party) and the Democrats have gotten far too complacent and need some fierce competition.
Comment by Reggie on August 21, 2009 at 11:21am
I agree, Dave. The two parties we have now are two sides of the same coin. I just don't see how a new party can gain traction in the current political climate that does very well to drown out competition.
Comment by Dave G on August 21, 2009 at 11:27am
The current two parties have put forth a lot of effort (in some of their only true bipartisan work) to ensure that the rise of a viable third party is unlikely. In Georgia, for example, the requirements to even get on the ballot for a non-Democrat/non-Republican candidate are several times as stringent and onerous. All under the guise of 'weeding out time wasters and non-viable candidates', of course.
Comment by Reggie on August 21, 2009 at 11:46am
Ha! God forbid we get time wasters in office.

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

  

Forum

FROM THE WORD OF GOD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT

Started by Stephen Gunn in Small Talk. Last reply by Belle Rose 1 hour ago. 2 Replies

Lobby

Started by Glen L in Small Talk 2 hours ago. 0 Replies

Disorders of Sex Development

Started by ɐuɐz ǝllǝıuɐp in Small Talk. Last reply by Quincy Maxwell 3 hours ago. 10 Replies

Deepak's challenge

Started by Davis Goodman in Small Talk. Last reply by Reg The Fronkey Farmer 4 hours ago. 27 Replies

Ken Hamm at it again

Started by Noel in Small Talk. Last reply by Erock68la 10 hours ago. 2 Replies

Events

Blog Posts

Labels

Posted by Quincy Maxwell on July 20, 2014 at 9:37pm 10 Comments

Services we love

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by Dan.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service