When retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, the current GOP 2016 front-runner, campaigns, he routinely pitches "common sense solutions from We the People." But it seems the candidate who celebrates a cheerful and straightforward populism has a fair bit of disdain for many of his fellow citizens, for at a videotaped event last year, while discussing the American people, he declared, "Many of them are stupid."
Ouch....that is brain melting. Does he even know his ABC's
American people, he declared, "Many of them are stupid."
True of any large population, depending on your definition of "many" and "stupid", really... Maybe he was trying to advocate for additional government spending on education? Being republican, I doubt it...
American voters aren't stupid. Perhaps some a uninformed or unable to detect blatant lies and impossible promises...but that goes for every country. I would be willing to bet the ratio of uninformed voters in the US is no different to the uninformed voters in Belgium or Australia.
I believe that when a candidate calls their electorate stupid...it tells you everything you need to know about the kind of leader they will be.
ratio of uninformed voters in the US is no different
This seems to contradict your premise - that voters aren't stupid, they're uninformed. My contention would be a combination of both. America, among civilized countries, must be one of the most uninformed electorates. And I consider this to be by design. Right wing politicians don't WANT the electorate to know what's going on. The very income of the oligarchs depends upon it.
On the other hand, looking at a plot of IQ scores (a bell curve, I'd assume), you'd find that around a quarter of the population has an IQ score of less than 85. At that level people would have trouble learning how to balance their checkbook. How would you expect them to understand the intricacies of politics. However these have all the same rights of the other 3/4 - and so it should be.
I've often maintained that the left needs a good televangelist to explain (in their unique way) how Christian the right really are.
I actually thought the same about "uninformed" ratio until I took a deeper look into voting behavior in Europe. I'll admit off the top that this isn't rigorous formal research. But I found...that even in Scandanavia there was an enormous chunk of voters who followed slogans instead of actual policy...who followed personality rather than platforms.
For me...the best comparison is between the United States and Canada. People tend to label Canadians as somehow smarter than Americans which I've always found trite. This might be true when covering political and geographic trivia (a Canadian is less likely to think that Hungary is in Africa or that France is the capital of Paris or that socialism is the first step towards soviet Russian totalitarianism. Allow the campaign to start and Canadians were easily swayed by cheap and impossible campaign promises and cheap attack adds and Canadians threw out a very conservative government for a decade (despite the fact that the middle class voter base was being and would be hurt financially and politically by them).
Davis, I still think you're getting the two confused. How about some rough definitions from my perspective:
Politically Uninformed Voters:- Those, regardless of their intelligence level, who are kept from (or who purposely keep themselves from) information which would further their understanding of how their government actually functions
Unintelligent Voters:- Those unable to conceptualize how their vote might actually affect government policy as it relates to themselves
The Scandinavian yoters you describe sound much closer to unintelligent (stupid, in your words:-). These voters are far more likely to be affected by slogans and personality cues because they simply can't understand the implications of their voting pattern. Since Nixon's "Southern Strategy", the right has targeted low-intelligence voters who would normally have voted left - toward an ideology far more likely to have a positive effect on them personally. That's why the Democratic Party should be focusing on this electorate - using techniques that are known to work - like flag-draped crosses and Jesus.
You can make voters better-informed. You can't make them more intelligent.
I agree with your definitions. I disagree that these particular voters are unintelligent. Canadian voters cannot be 40% stupid one campaign and then 20% stupid the other. They can be uninformed and misinformed through campaign rhetoric, being unaccustomed to getting their information from more than one source, unaccustomed to delving deeper into political discourse, less educated on political-social issues (basic ideologies, history of political change, modern socialism, modern capitalism, utility of coalition building etc.
In fact...the only country where there tends to be less of massive ideological voting swing (no party sees more than a 10% change in votes...even less on their side of the political spectrum)...is where campaign commercials are seriously limited, attack ads banned in other media, corporate donations are banned and social/political education is strong in schooling. Denmark
I feel rather certain that if campaigning styles changed in the united states, if more parties prospered and if Americans were educated younger on political-social ideologies and the political system...there would be a lot less swing and less successful clowns in the republican race. Americans in general aren't stupid...with the information they have they vote for the candidate they believe will serve their interests the most.
Americans really ARE stupid. In fact half of us have less than an average IQ.
Started by maruli marulaki in Ethics & Morals May 14, 2020. 0 Replies 1 Like
Started by Andrew Guthrie in Religion and the Religious, Atheism and Atheists. Last reply by 34u0tmz9oc778 Apr 16, 2020. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by D L in Small Talk. Last reply by 34u0tmz9oc778 Apr 21, 2020. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by rudrappa agadi in Pseudoscience, The Paranormal, and Conspiracy Theories. Last reply by 34u0tmz9oc778 Apr 9, 2020. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by D L in Small Talk. Last reply by D L Aug 8, 2020. 6 Replies 1 Like
Posted by James C Rocks on November 12, 2020 at 10:49am 5 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by ETRON on September 6, 2019 at 12:44pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2021 Created by Rebel.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!
Join Think Atheist