It's been a long time in the making, but I am an atheist. More specifically, I'm a nontheist with atheist, Humanist, and pantheist sways. I think religion is a part of human nature; it's our way to simplify the complexities of the universe, a way to enforce morality, and a way to fulfill our basic human need to see order in chaos. It helps us cope as we mourn and fear death, it gives us hope when things are tough, and it gives us comfort when we see the imbalance and chaos between good and evil in the world. I don't think that's a bad thing; I think it's magnificent. It's beautiful, poetic; prayer has scientifically been proven to bring physical benefits to the person who is praying. It bonds communities together. It compels people to do good who otherwise probably would not bother. I believe that in many communities and for many people, its a necessary motivator to help people remain moral. For some people who have been through great trauma, its necessary for their sanity and recovery (notice a lot of trafficking survivors become very religious after their experience).

That said, I don't believe in the God of Abraham. In the Old Testament, he ordered the genocide of the Canaanites, made a racist discrimination between Jews and Gentiles, allowed a human sacrifice, brutalized homosexuals, allowed concubinage (sex slavery), did not allow divorce in domestic violence situations, required animal sacrifice, and treated women as subordinate. I understand that once the ultimate sacrifice was made (Jesus), the rules changed. That doesn't mean God changed, however. He's still the same God who did those things; He is eternal and everlasting; He is outside the confines of space and time. He is who He has always been, and I don't like Him. Even in the New Testament, He didn't get all that much better. According to Peter any way, He still treats women as subordinate, doesn't allow divorce in the face of domestic violence, and considers the people He created as homosexuals as innate sinners. I'm bisexual and believe in the empowerment of women, so that doesn't sit right with me. Why is rape never mentioned as a sin outside the context of fornication or general abuse? If talking back to your parents made the Top 10 list, how did rape not get a specific mention? Also, when viewed objectively, the history of Christianity is very similar to any other religion in that in originated out of a particular culture in a particular ethnic group and gradually spread from there. Christianity's parables are as hokey and strange as any other religion; it's just harder to see it when you've grown up with it. The idea of a blue god with six arms is strange to us, but the idea of a talking burning bush isn't. I don't believe that the God of the Bible exists, and if He does, I want nothing to do with Him.

Now, we could take the approach that the Bible was written by men who had a flawed viewed of God and were using religion to accomplish political goals and that we must see past these perversions and explore with our own hearts who the God of the Bible really is. Being a law student, I don't buy that approach either. Taking in the Bible verses we like and ignoring the ones that make us uncomfortable seems like a really messy and illegitimate way to handle things. The Bible is God's Word, or it isn't. The God of the Bible exists, or He doesn't.

Now, it's also possible that God is a spiritual entity that has simply been interpreted in different ways and in different cultural perspectives; this would explain why Yahweh, Allah, God, Buddhist Enlightenment, and the thousands of Hindu gods that make up the many faces of what some Hindus consider one deity are all very, very similar. So maybe Christianity is just the way our culture worships this spiritual entity. This rings a bit more true to me. However, I'm not willing to partake in that either. There is NO major religion that supports complete gender equality and some of my other moral convictions and so I'm not going to take part.

I also reject the idea that there is any ultimate "evil" in the world or that there is order and justice in all this chaos. When we look at traffickers we can see evil, or we can see a woman who grew up a trafficking victim herself and also needs support and love. When we look at rapists we can see evil, or we can see a troubled boy who was violently abused by his father. When we look at murderers we can see evil, or we can see the effects of decades of unaddressed mental illness. When these people were not given the love and support they needed thanks to the chaos in our governments, families, cycles of poverty, and health sector, more chaos ensued. These people aren't 'getting what they deserve' when they go to hell; what they deserved was love and support as a child and they didn't get it. No one deserves hell. The concept of 'evil' is just an oversimplification of the chaos we don't understand and an answer to our fear and rage. We can view something like trafficking as evil, or tear apart its complexities and realize that it's simply a series of unfortunate events that flow together to cause misery. This dissected view allows us to get to the heart of the matter in a way the blanket label of evil doesn't; better rehabilitation of sexual abuse survivors may lead to fewer sexual abusers in the future -- executing and punishing any sexual abuser we catch vengefully and righteously may not. Rejecting an ultimate evil led me to reject the idea of an ultimate good, which led to my acceptance of chaos in place of the existence of a deity.

That said, I believe that we have a moral duty to create order and justice to the best of our ability and to make this world a better place. Where does that moral duty come from if not from a man in the clouds? I believe it's instinctual, but evolved to a more spiritual and intellectual level than anything animals can feel. It's instinctual to want your offspring to live prosperously and to continue to flourish. it's instinctual to want your species to continue happily eternally. For humans, this takes on a much more emotional and spiritual dimension. Just because this moral duty doesn't come from a man in the sky doesn't make it any less beautiful, honorable, or spiritual. I don't have to believe in a deity to want a better life for my fellow man or to have numerous specific moral beliefs and obligations.

I believe straights and GLBTs should all be treated the same; I believe women should be given all the same rights as men; I believe safe, responsible sex between consenting unmarried adults is okay; I believe the Jews aren't and never were any more special than the Canaanites, Palestinians, Kurds, Tibetans, or any other group; I hold a lot of moral beliefs that are contrary to mainstream Christianity. In my opinion, this makes mainstream Christianity immoral.

Yet, as an atheist, I'm assumed to be immoral while Christians are assumed to be moral. Atheists are discriminated against in many ways in this country. For example, we can't get elected to Congress (there is only 1 openly atheist politician in the federal government; he's one of our 438 representatives). We aren't eligible to work for IJM, World Vision, or Gracehaven unless we lie about our beliefs (which, ironically, is immoral in my opinion so I won't). We're assumed to be selfish, pessimistic, indulgent, and bad with children. Most atheists have to claim they are 'agnostic' or 'spiritual' or 'just not sure' to avoid discrimination and judgment. I know, for many years, that's what I did. I didn't 'come out' as an atheist until I watched this interview:

So there's my religious beliefs! They're not appropriate for everyone, and I wouldn't encourage everyone to adopt them. Jesus is such a big part of some people's lives, I can't imagine how devastated they would be if they arrived at the same conclusions that I myself have come to. It can be depressing, scary, and demotivating to hold my beliefs. I believe that there are some people though (like me) who are very happy and comfortable accepting things the way I have. I have never felt more free, whole, or happy finally believing that living by my own moral code is okay and that I don't have to worry about a man in the sky judging me. I think religion is a lot like human companionship; most of us need it to stay sane and happy, while a minority of us don't.

Views: 199

Comment by John Siqueiros on July 30, 2012 at 2:15am

Thank you for your thoughts, Tabitha.

For the record, I didn't feel particularly devastated about becoming an atheist despite a prior faith in Jesus as Savior and Lord. I had long been a Cafeteria Catholic, and I feel like I just progressed into rejecting even more of the Catholic doctrine by rejecting the notion of God. I don't really try to break away completely from my Catholic heritage, since it remains as much a part of me as being an American or, in my case, a Mexican-American.

Comment by James Cox on July 30, 2012 at 10:10am

What can one say, when your posting is quiet sufficient.

Comment by Ed on July 30, 2012 at 3:05pm

"I think religion is a lot like human companionship; most of us need it to stay sane and happy, while a minority of us don't."

I don't necessarily agree that religion is required by someone to maintain their sanity and happiness. They probably grew up with it and went through the normal channels of indoctrination on their way to relying on religion as a crutch. Those among us who were raised in an environment devoid of imaginary friends never developed the needs that go with theism. They have learned that sanity and happiness is predicated on a healthy mind that remains free of the influences and false promises of theism. 

Comment by Unseen on July 30, 2012 at 9:23pm

You know, you can just believe in what science shows is true, and leave the stuff science is still figuring out as mystery. One thing (one of many things) I find silly about theists is that they accuse atheists of wanting to take all the mystery out of the universe. The irony is that most atheists accept that the creation of the universe in the big bang will probably never be explained and so will remain The Great Mystery Of Creation. It is the theists who can't accept the mystery and posit a magical sorcerer (God) as the Creator.

All of the human needs you say religion fills can be filled without religion.

BTW, pantheism is still theism.

Comment by Tom Holm on July 30, 2012 at 11:57pm

 I think religion is a part of human nature; it's our way to simplify the complexities of the universe, a way to enforce morality, and a way to fulfill our basic human need to see order in chaos.

No, no and no. We do not need religion for any of this, only the people that are too scared to understand the world around them need religion for these things. The complexities of the use need no simplifying, but they need to be better understood. There is no good and evil, only what we as a society and as human beings decide what is ''good'' and what is ''evil'', so I do not see good and evil coincides with chaos. Prayer has also been proven to work as a placebo, which probably explains how people may think prayer cures them of diseases. Though at the same time, prayer has also been proven to be a waste of time and just used to make people feel like they are actually doing something worthwhile.

Comment by Unseen on July 31, 2012 at 12:39pm

I will disagree with you some.

I think she's right that religion does create a bond, but it's an artificial one, a kind of Jerry Seinfeld bond "about nothing." When you say "Anyone sufficiently adept at rallying people, could unite a community behind any number of humanitarian causes..." I think you're missing her point. She's not talking about A community but rather THE community. In religious areas of the world, religion is a uniting factor creating community where none would otherwise exist. What you are talking about creates A community, but you can't rally a town behind kindness to animals or even fighting cancer in a way that creates THE community that unites the town or even a country.

Maybe THAT people are ethical is more important than WHY (to the community).

If fantasy helps someone face death better than family and friends (who will be there anyway), who are you or I to deny them that?

Comment by Cristynfaye on July 31, 2012 at 7:27pm

I absolutely agree with you on every point.  It's really refreshing to hear someone else who doesn't see religion as a completely horrible thing.  It has a lot of horrible aspects, but I also see a lot of beauty in it, and I do treasure a lot of what I learned as a Christian, and my experiences as a Christian.  Though I also feel the same as you, that I am more happy and free now than I ever was in the Church.

Comment by Diana Prince on July 31, 2012 at 8:33pm

Thanks for contributing your opinions everyone! I really appreciate it. It's quite refreshing!


You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

© 2020   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service