Call me a conservative, but never call me a religious zealot all for "pro-life" when it's convienent. This whole debacle with the Health Care reform bill... the fact that they put anti-abortion rhetoric in there just to get the republicans to sign off DISGUSTS me! Either they have a sound plan and all people will vote for it because it's sound or you don't. Playing for the political vote just to get *some* of what you want by introducing whacked out legislature is offensive in my book.

Not to mention the "requirement" for either self funded or federal health care. Currently, the crappy company I'm with doesn't have anything other than PPO available to me... for me alone since I'm such a "high risk" (overweight and a smoker), that's $400 a month and if I get married it's almost $1000 a month. I support 3 children that aren't mine biologically and I'm not married, so according to the new "requirements" I don't qualify for the free health care but I'm still REQUIRED to hold some sort of health care?!?! I have a wonderful job and wouldn't give it up for the world, but the health care they offer would take the bread out of my kids' mouths. I am the sole bread winner here (as a woman) because I want my *future husband* (good luck with that with all these legal restrictions) to spend all his time with his kids and give them that 50's home life that most of us weren't privy too. I'm also supporting my ex-boyfriend's grown daughter, that I raised since 4 years old, as she goes to college because I love her as my own... but according to the freaking government that's not "relevant". I've been uninsured for over 5 years and as "high risk" as I am I've only been to the doctor 2 times. The last time I was given a gleaming bill of health. Go figure. But yeah, if I got pregnant and had 4 children I'd qualify... where would that have left the kids I'm supporting??!?!?!?!?!?

I'm not super rich as the liberals would have you believe. I make a lot of money but almost 40% of that is taken in taxes. I'm not protected by the republicans because I'm not a trust fund baby. I have made my way in this freakin world as best I could WITHOUT A COLLEGE EDUCATION and live paycheck to paycheck taking care of everyone around me. I love these people with all my heart and give up much for them... where's my relief? Why am I required to pay this new health care reform? How am I supposed to pay for my *pseudo* children? I'm only seen on forms as a wealthy single woman. Is that really what I am?

Why doesn't this bill support those most that need abortions? The people that get abortions are the ones that know they can't afford a baby or know that they can't support a child like they should. They are making the HARDEST DECISION IN THEIR LIFE, usually based on their current situation. I have had an abortion. It was the hardest thing ever, but I wouldn't have had the 3 children I do now if it hadn't happened. Was one life a sacrifice for these 3? Possibly, maybe, and, yeah, I still yearn for that "child of my own"... to know what that is like and to be *that* connected, but in reality, I wasn't ready, I wasn't mature enough, and I certainly couldn't have afforded it on my own. Yay, planned parenthood for being there. I look back on it now with a sad heart, but also with the heart knowing that these people I'm there for have the best *kinda* mom that they could ever have (only kinda because they weren't pushed out of my uterus). They love me and I love them and I would NEVER give that up.

Sorry for the rant but I'm a little pissed off at the moment.

Views: 25

Comment by Scott A. Hunt on November 13, 2009 at 8:52am
No, you are not the only one. The problem all along with the health care bill is that the Republicans are against just about anything, especially if the Dems are for it, and the Dems have no backbone whatsoever.
Comment by Johnny on November 13, 2009 at 10:44am
Now featured!

Also, you and others might be interested in this: has an action alert form letter ready to send to Senate Leader Harry Reid.

Tell Senate Leader Reid: Stop the Abortion Coverage Ban
Comment by Frink on November 13, 2009 at 11:26pm
"As the liberals would have you believe."

Liberals are not a bunch of judgmental asshats, as the conservatives would have you believe.
Comment by Stephanie A on November 14, 2009 at 3:09am
I admit that my ramblings were brought upon by my anger at the situation, coupled with a couple cocktails. In actuality, I'm a little embarrassed by not writing out my thoughts more clearly.

So yeah, Neal, it was weird and I promise I will back up my random thoughts with references and better thought out sentences.

Jen, yes, I completely agree, it's really not off topic because it's law vs. "family" and it's not right. I'm very passionate about how family is defined and legislated. This bill in particular spells out what's required to qualify for the government healthcare depending on how many children you birthed/adopted/support AS A PARENT5 and if you are married, coupled with how much you earn... not your expenses; Not somebody like me who supports a bunch of people but doesn't subscribe to to the typical marriage or people who are same sex or are widowed with risk of losing pensions or retirements.... how many of us does that leave out if we don't subscribe to "normalcy" or the biblical description of a commited relationship? But yet we are REQUIRED to carry either the government plan or a plan of our own or be FINED. Then on top of all that it denies abortion for those who really need the insurance to pay for it! So, those who opposed abortion get to say "my money doesn't go to that" but those of us who don't want to deny abortion services are required to support this plan???? GRRR!!! Sorry getting angry again.

Frink, sorry, I didn't mean to offend. I was more trying to position myself as in between. I'm liberal with personal responsibilities and a conservative economically... my political party is Libertarian although I realize that's probably idealistic and chaotic to the extreme.

In any, case I will expound further, but at the moment I'm super tired. Thanks for reading and replying.
Comment by Gaytor on November 19, 2009 at 8:12pm
For me, even bigger than choice, is that under the Stupak Amendment, women whom use the subsidy of the public option, can't even buy private insurance that covers abortion. Those whom choose to bury their heads in the sand don't realize that abortion is a valid medical procedure. You have stillborns, that need to be extracted. Missing brains, Spina bifada that isn't survivable, No skin, etc etc. The defects list can go on and on. Should a baby be born to appease a religious tenet that is Biblically invalid in the first place? It's more religion preventing reason and science.


You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

© 2018   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service