A lame excuse for a Christian apologetic.

I have over the last few years steadily lost respect for William Lane Craig as an apologist. His voice grates on my ears more and more. His willingness to accept genocide as acceptable because his god commanded it is pathetic and I have shook my head in bewilderment at the acceptance such statements get from his herd of followers. So when I saw this video I said to myself “Don’t do it man, you will only get annoyed”. Of course “Do not press that button” never worked for me so I did. Can you guess how I feel about him now?

The man is a twit. He is now to be called William Lame Craig. He has no concept of what Atheism is and he certainly has no concept of what Hitchens was about. I revoke any credit I ever gave him and he can shove his KCA along with the rest of his moronic apologetics. Hitchens once said of Jerry Falwell “If you gave him an enema you could bury him in a matchbox”. I think it is better suited to the lame one.

0 members like this

Comment by Amanda Mrakovich on March 2, 2013 at 3:16pm: I hate him.

Comment by kOrsan on March 2, 2013 at 3:27pm: How can anyone degrade the word "debater" by using it in the same sentence as the name of that sanctimonious douchebag WLC? I hope his entire family gets cancer. His parents are fucking assholes for raising such a spawn of intellectual dishonesty. Also whoever gave him his fake diploma in the fairy-tale-sciences- I want to grate a pineapple on your face. Theology / Christian Philosophy / Theosophy...whatever the fuck you want to call it to make it sound more important; It's not a real field, sorry. You're no more educated than a common peasant Will.

,

Comment by Reg The Fronkey Farmer on March 2, 2013 at 3:59pm: When it comes to the study of Theology I like this quote from Thomas Paine:

“The study of theology, as it stands in the Christian churches, is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no principles; it proceeds by no authority; it has no data; it can demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion”.

Not much left to debate is there??

Comment by Stutz on March 2, 2013 at 11:51pm: WLC's Kalam fails in its first sentence: "Whatever beings to exist has a cause." Since all things are simply rearrangements of existing matter/energy, nothing has ever "begun to exist" except maybe the universe itself, and even that's not for sure. So it's not even remotely a generally applicable principle, since there's only one (maybe) known example.

Comment by Val Wuthrich on March 3, 2013 at 1:13am: WLC may be a good, well prepared debater. He may even win some debates. That, however, does not make him right.

Comment by RobertPiano on March 5, 2013 at 10:05pm: Speaking of lame stuff, listen to this:

http://old.richarddawkins.net/videos/644277-god-sent-christopher-hi...

Comment by MikeLong on March 5, 2013 at 10:55pm: Laughed so hard I almost choked.

Comment

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

‹ Previous
1
2
Next ›

RSS

Welcome to
Think Atheist

Get Started Now
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

What's new today

1	America - "Love It or Leave It"
2	The Republicans accelerate their downward spiral
3	How common is this?
4	Accosted
5	Praying Won't Do Shit!
6	This is the best way I've ever seen to teach someone evolution
7	'Smite Club'
8	I want to get off now.
9	True!
10	Scan001