Started Oct 15, 2010 0 Replies 0 Likes
I had a little fun with this one. Of course, my impersonation ended up sounding like a combination of a southern minister, Bruce from Family Guy, and some sort of effeminate male character.Continue
Started this discussion. Last reply by S Aug 22, 2010. 8 Replies 0 Likes
Oh no! We lose! What are we gonna do now?Of course, I already answered his question, as did many, MANY other atheists, but does he listen? Of course not, he continues to block video comments and…Continue
Tags: ignorance, debate, atheism, question, shockofgod
Started this discussion. Last reply by Jānis Ķimsis Aug 5, 2010. 3 Replies 0 Likes
So I've decided recently to write a book about atheism. When approaching the subject, I considered the fact that I couldn't point to one book that I could use as a handy reference that included…Continue
Started this discussion. Last reply by Yet Another Atheist Aug 4, 2010. 7 Replies 0 Likes
I'm all for the Red Lobster Amendment - protect the sanctity of... uh... not eating shellfish! Yeah!!Continue
Yet Another Atheist has not received any gifts yet
Posted on September 23, 2010 at 1:30pm 5 Comments 0 Likes
Posted on September 21, 2010 at 2:30pm 1 Comment 0 Likes
Welcome to the third installment in what is sure to be a lengthy response to the claims and arguments made in the popular Christian iPhone app for debaters and apologists, called Fast Facts.Started by Mercedes in Welcome to Think Atheist. Last reply by Greg Heumann 1 minute ago. 322 Replies 0 Likes
Posted by Cathy Cooper on May 17, 2013 at 10:00am 3 Comments 0 Likes
May 11, 2013 at 12pm to May 18, 2013 at 6pm – Stillpoint Farm, MD
0 Comments 0 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.

Comment Wall (5 comments)
You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!
Join Think Atheist
I'llrefer you you to Webster's Third Unabridged, in which the definition of lack is "(1) to be wanting or missing." The first definition of the transitive verb lack is "to be void or destitute of; to be without or deficient in." And "to stand in need of." Let's note, too, that the two chief synonyms of lack are listed as "want" and "need." These are the "core definitions" of lack, and that's why it's a mistake for atheists to keep using that self-insulting definition.
Belief in gods is nothing that atheists lack. We are not in want of it, and we do not need it. These are unarguably the primary connotations of the word lack.
Yo, YAA, kindly let me point out, as I had done just above your post jusyt now, that it's a mistake for us to define atheism as a "lack of belief in gods," although it is a commonly advanced definition. That definition is mistaken because it's the theists' definition of the word. Many dictionaries offer this definition, I realize, but dictionaries are largely written by theists--theists who fail to recognize their implicit bias.
The word "lack" carries the connotation of deficiency, the sense that what is lacking is something to be desired. By definition, to lack something is to be in want of whatever one lacks. Atheists know that belief in god is nothing to be desired. So we are certainly not in want of it.
The better and more accurate definition is: "the absence of [belief in] gods."
As George Smith has written:
"Atheism, therefore, is the absence of theistic belief. One who does not believe in the existence of a god or supernatural being is properly designated as an atheist. Atheism is sometimes defined as 'the belief that there is no God of any kind,' or the claim that a god cannot exist. While these are categories of atheism, they do not exhaust the meaning of atheism--and are somewhat misleading with respect to the basic nature of atheism. Atheism, in its basic form, is not a belief: it is the absence of belief. An atheist is not primarily a person who believes that a god does not exist, rather he does not believe in the existence of a god."
--Atheism: The Case Against God (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1989)