""Common-sense suggests at least "two orders of reality" (CEM Joad), so for Richard Dawkins to posit only one 'Science-based' reality, to explain what is real, suggests not least a lack of balance on his part" - Richard…"
-
Richard W. Symonds
- Male
- West Sussex
- United Kingdom
- Blog Posts (1)
- Discussions (360)
- Events
- Groups (1)
- Photos
- Photo Albums
- Videos
Richard W. Symonds's Discussions
Has Mankind Stopped Evolving ?
Started this discussion. Last reply by Reg The Fronkey Farmer Mar 3, 2011. 21 Replies 0 Likes
http://mail.aol.com/33222-111/aol-1/en-gb/Suite.aspx Mankind Has Stopped Evolving MICHIO KAKU Professor of Theoretical Physics,…Continue
"Noam Chomsky Is An Infinitely Better Scientist Than Richard Dawkins, Intellectually & Morally - And An Infinitely Better Atheist" - RWS
Started this discussion. Last reply by Richard W. Symonds Feb 16, 2011. 49 Replies 0 Likes
"Noam Chomsky is an infinitely better Scientist than Richard Dawkins, intellectually & morally - and an infinitely better Atheist" - RWSChomsky puts Science and Mystery in Perspective…Continue
ETIOLOGISTS (eg Richard Symonds) vs. ETHOLOGISTS (eg Richard Dawkins)
Started Feb 5, 2011 0 Replies 0 Likes
Richard Symonds ETIOLOGIST - The Study of Human Causes (eg The Reasons Why People Do What they Do, Say What They Say, & Think What They Think)…Continue
Doesn't This Article Make The Likes Of Scientist Richard Dawkins Appear Profoundly Silly ?
Started this discussion. Last reply by Kris Feenstra Feb 9, 2011. 406 Replies 0 Likes
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Blamin ... 2-792.htmlBlaming Religion for the Evils of the World…Continue
Gifts Received
Richard W. Symonds has not received any gifts yet
Richard W. Symonds's Page
Latest Activity
Richard W. Symonds replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion '"WHAT IS REAL ? ASKED THE RABBIT ONE DAY..."'Richard W. Symonds replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion '"WHAT IS REAL ? ASKED THE RABBIT ONE DAY..."'""Common-sense suggests at least "two orders of reality" (CEM Joad), so for Richard Dawkins to posit only one 'Science-based' reality, to explain what is real, suggests not least a lack of balance on his part" - Richard…"
Richard W. Symonds replied to Dallas the Phallus's discussion 'Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty' in the group Atheist Morality"This sounds very much like Professor Marc Hauser's forthcoming book "Evilicious : Why We Evolved A Taste For Being Bad" (Viking Penguin), who has already written Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and…"
Richard W. Symonds replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion 'IF YOU WANT TO BE AN ENLIGHTENED MORAL ATHEIST, LET NOAM CHOMSKY BE YOUR INSPIRATION - NOT RICHARD DAWKINS' in the group Atheist Morality"Chomsky on Morals
http://www.thinkatheist.com/forum/topics/chomsky-on-morals"
John Siqueiros replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion 'IF YOU WANT TO BE AN ENLIGHTENED MORAL ATHEIST, LET NOAM CHOMSKY BE YOUR INSPIRATION - NOT RICHARD DAWKINS' in the group Atheist Morality"I can't really say whether the authors' criticism of the "New Atheists" is on point, mainly because I'm not familiar with any sort of New Atheist doctrine (other than, of course, being atheist). I generally agree with the…"
Sochel Narten liked Richard W. Symonds's discussion IF YOU WANT TO BE AN ENLIGHTENED MORAL ATHEIST, LET NOAM CHOMSKY BE YOUR INSPIRATION - NOT RICHARD DAWKINS
Stephen Walski replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion 'IF YOU WANT TO BE AN ENLIGHTENED MORAL ATHEIST, LET NOAM CHOMSKY BE YOUR INSPIRATION - NOT RICHARD DAWKINS' in the group Atheist Morality"What a bunch of hippie bullshit."
Sassan K. replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion 'IF YOU WANT TO BE AN ENLIGHTENED MORAL ATHEIST, LET NOAM CHOMSKY BE YOUR INSPIRATION - NOT RICHARD DAWKINS' in the group Atheist Morality"Only in your deluded world."
Richard W. Symonds replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion 'IF YOU WANT TO BE AN ENLIGHTENED MORAL ATHEIST, LET NOAM CHOMSKY BE YOUR INSPIRATION - NOT RICHARD DAWKINS' in the group Atheist Morality"Sassan, we now live in a world of illusion & delusion where the insane are judged sane, and the sane are judged insane. "
Ryan E. Hoffman replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion 'IF YOU WANT TO BE AN ENLIGHTENED MORAL ATHEIST, LET NOAM CHOMSKY BE YOUR INSPIRATION - NOT RICHARD DAWKINS' in the group Atheist Morality"What a bunch of rubbish. He cites Hedges against Hitchens and Harris??? Hedges has been absolutely annihilated in debate by both Harris and Hitchens in separate debates. And Chomsky continues with this ridiculous notion of Islamophobia. If this…"
Sassan K. replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion 'IF YOU WANT TO BE AN ENLIGHTENED MORAL ATHEIST, LET NOAM CHOMSKY BE YOUR INSPIRATION - NOT RICHARD DAWKINS' in the group Atheist Morality"And I call him "Nim Chimpsky" because that's what he is - an utterly irrelevant insane fool."
Sassan K. replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion 'IF YOU WANT TO BE AN ENLIGHTENED MORAL ATHEIST, LET NOAM CHOMSKY BE YOUR INSPIRATION - NOT RICHARD DAWKINS' in the group Atheist Morality"What an ignorant article. Anyone who uses the word "islamophobia" is an utter naive masochistic fool."
Richard W. Symonds added a discussion to the group Atheist Morality
IF YOU WANT TO BE AN ENLIGHTENED MORAL ATHEIST, LET NOAM CHOMSKY BE YOUR INSPIRATION - NOT RICHARD DAWKINS
Noam Chomsky's atheist morality makes more sense to me than the atheist non-sense of 'Richard Dawkins & his Merrie Men' http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/07/the-new-atheists-political-narratives-and-the-betrayal-of-the-enlightenment/ This article has focused on the New Atheists and the betrayal of the Enlightenment. In part II, we will explore legitimate heirs of the…See More
Richard W. Symonds replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion 'THE DAWKINS DELUSION & THE BERING "SON OF DAWKINS" ILLUSION'""Replies closed for this discussion"
http://www.thinkatheist.com/forum/topics/the-real-delusion-of-new
WHY ?"
Jay Voigt replied to Richard W. Symonds's discussion 'THE REAL DELUSION OF NEW ATHEISTS LIVING AN ILLUSION'"You actually believe the church does not have an inordinate amount of power in our country? They have billions of dollars in their budgets each year, get ridiculous amounts of special consideration from the government and don't pay taxes.…"
Profile Information
- Your Religious Status
- Christian
- About Me:
- A MAN OF MANY PARTS, MOST OF WHICH DON'T WORK - ESPECIALLY MY EARS : I AM VERY DEAF
- Age
- 53-58
- Why are you here?
- Curiousity
Richard W. Symonds's Blog
ATHEISTS HAVE BETTER SEX ?
Posted on May 20, 2011 at 5:00pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
Comment Wall (1 comment)
- At 12:28am on July 28, 2011,
Gaytor said… Hi Richard. Your blog in the approval process right now is shy on content. If you didn't want to duplicate the material with attribution, some people feel weird about that and some authors don't like it, you could have up the link like you do, but we would ask for some of your thoughts about it. It could be a short paragraph. We just avoid the links only here. Maybe it's as simple as stating what speaks to you about the article. If you can do that we can get it approved for you. Contact me if I can help!
What's new today
Forum
Why do atheists ask for so much proof to believe in God?
Started by Mercedes in Welcome to Think Atheist. Last reply by Bjorn Sodergren 17 seconds ago. 324 Replies 0 Likes
Blog Posts
How Jesus' Views on Marriage Proves Yahweh's Laws are NOT Absolute OR Jesus is Mistaken
Posted by Cathy Cooper on May 17, 2013 at 10:00am 3 Comments 0 Likes
Events
-
Frederick Beer Week
May 11, 2013 at 12pm to May 18, 2013 at 6pm – Stillpoint Farm, MD
0 Comments 0 Likes
Services we love
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
