Mark Emerson
  • Male
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • United States
Share on Facebook
Share Twitter
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (13)
  • Events
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Gifts Received

Gift

Mark Emerson has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Mark Emerson's Page

Latest Activity

Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"Yes."
Jun 28, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"I'm replying here to your omnipotence question, as we are at the limit of the intent levels. Phenomenon is an undefined term, and all variables (e.g. x, y, z) are phenomena.  Causes is also an undefined term, and is a two-place predicate…"
Jun 28, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"This is in reply to Strega's post below. As I found Deism defined here (but without an in-depth examination of the definition), it appears we have proven the Deity exists, per such definition, which I am calling God. As for Theism, the…"
Jun 28, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"archaeopteryx, My experiment is GOOD SCIENCE, not a "bar bet"! I'm not "inviting" Gallup's Mirror into a "bet." He (or perhaps she, but probably he) has no choice here, rather like the guinea pigs in a lab…"
Jun 28, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"This is in reply to Strega's post below, which appears be at the limit of indentation on this forum, as there was no reply button. The breathtaking mathematical results from about 1880 to the present, virtually all of which rest on predicate…"
Jun 27, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"I apologize for misspelling Gallup at the end of my post.  Just caught it after the 15 minutes to edit expired."
Jun 27, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"You and others in this forum seem to be saying in your writings (screaming actually), that you are unwilling to believe anything unless there is empirical evidence for it. You say you want "data." Accordingly, I am right now, via this post…"
Jun 27, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"Why not stick with the truth and stop distorting the facts?  The 9 videos can all be streamed FREE at lower resolution.  Payment is ONLY if you want to DOWNLOAD a high-resolution copy.  And the 2 Technical Papers, which contain the…"
Jun 26, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"Thank you again, Gallup's Mirror, for your comment. I shall respond to your points one by one. >It's not my characterization. You'll have to take that up with Wikipedia.You quoted wikipedia, but I'm sure you realize ANYBODY…"
Jun 24, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"Thank you, Gallup's Mirror, for your comment. I'm certain you are not a "crackpot," as you have characterized me, but I will not take offense. :)You make insightful reference to Hatcher's work, which was the inspiration for…"
Jun 24, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"Thank you for your comment on my proof. I'm certain you are well intended, and a nice guy. However, I strongly disagree with most of what you wrote. And so, in the spirit of open debate, I respond as follows:You mentioned "Einstein's…"
Jun 23, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"The First-Order Predicate Logic proof that God exists, as discussed in my comment above (see http://www.thegproof.org ), is patently *NOT* an ontological argument, is WHOLLY UNRELATED to any ontological argument, and it has NONE of the…"
Jun 23, 2013
Mark Emerson replied to Emily DW's discussion 'What's Your Best Argument For God?'
"As for the Ontological argument mentioned in Emily DW's post, it dates back to Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109), long before Decartes (1596–1650), and it dates forward to Kurt Godel (1906-1978), who formalized it using modal logic.…"
Jun 23, 2013
Mark Emerson is now a member of Think Atheist
Jun 23, 2013

Profile Information

Your Religious Status
Other
Age
59-64
Relationship Status
Single
The religion you left
Was never a part of one
Think Atheist Travel Network Couch Availability - Are you able to host anyone now?
No

Comment Wall

You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

  • No comments yet!
 
 
 

  

Blog Posts

People

Posted by ɐuɐz ǝllǝıuɐp on July 28, 2014 at 10:27pm 1 Comment

Services we love

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by Dan.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service