Only if we're really not being intellectually honest with the kids.
That photo might be better with flags, since nationalism and odd perceptions of "national self-interest" have caused more armed conflict.
I'd say the real cause of conflicts tends to be competition for limited resources. If we're looking for reasons why different groups of people clump together when competing for resources it's family first, and then tribalism in all its flavors - tribe, ethnicity, nation, religion. It's intellectually dishonest to condemn religion without condemning in even stronger terms tribalism, ethnic identity/racism, and nationalism.
Very true Bob, nobody have every been killed in the name of any religion. We should just put warning stickers on them or not allow children to read such books until they are (say) 16 years old.
Religion is a tool of politics or perhaps the other way around also to control the population and justify horrible morals toward one another
Dr. Bob is correct. Hatred and opposition to another group is fairly natural in tribal societies, however it has been shown that when two tribes meet they are generally wary but initially friendly. Over time difficulties develop that concern resources and within that it is often the proximity of another tribe that creates animosity--then comes ethnicity, nation, religion and other differences. Give man a reason to hate and you have the found the best motivator of all.
Remember what Rumpelstiltskin said in Shrek? "Get yer mob on!" so true, so true. The inherent difficulty in religion is that all modern religions, perhaps except Jainism, are based in converting others. Thus those not converted are seen as antagonists. Religion, as supportive of static, unchanging knowledge continues the reasoning needed to avoid learning and thinking. There is far more but this is not the time to get overly involved.
The idea that two groups, whose differences lie in a mixture of ethnicity, religion, & nationalism, would rather take up weapons and kill one another instead of reaching a peaceful resolution shows that we have not come far enough in our evolutionary development. Man's proclivity to maim and kill those in disagreement with one another somehow remains an acceptable choice of action. I can only think our civilization would be that much farther ahead were we to dispense with those archaic tools that unfairly challenge and rebuke those who hold opposing views and values. Religion remains a tool to fan the deadly flames of war and conquest; Palestinians and Jews are an unfortunate example.
Join Think Atheist
Welcome toThink Atheist
Get Started Nowor Sign In
Or sign in with:
Started by Unseen in Law, Trials, and Decisions 8 hours ago.
Started by Unseen in Small Talk. Last reply by Davis Goodman 12 hours ago.
Started by Unseen in Religion and the Religious, Atheism and Atheists. Last reply by Belle Rose 11 hours ago.
Started by Belle Rose in Advice. Last reply by Reg The Fronkey Farmer 16 hours ago.
Started by Peter in Small Talk. Last reply by Belle Rose 11 hours ago.
Posted by Simon Mathews on April 15, 2015 at 4:14am
Posted by Belle Rose on April 15, 2015 at 1:00am
Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com
© 2015 Created by umar.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.