How is it a Straw Man argument? Many theists and deists are absolutely 100% convinced that God exists, and say "I know he exists". To say that knowing something requires evidence is a straw man, is to use the phrase straw man incorrectly - as per most people who use it.
I hate the phrase "straw man" even when used correctly as it is not an argument on its own, just a wall to hide behind.
All these replies are for you, Bugme Not, You can read the original thread here.
Peter Darley - By definition it can't be a straw man, because it doesn't talk about what other people believe.
11:05 AM +3
Joel Bass - Nope, it's not a straw man... I'm not sure it's a great argument, though. It insists that anybody who believes in anything has to use the scientific method. I don't think that's how most humans throughout history have lived, actually. I love the scientific method, and I think it's extremely helpful. But if someone's on their deathbed, hoping there's an afterlife, I think the scientific method might not be foremost on their mind, and that's okay, isn't it?
11:10 AM +4
Peter Darley - It's not saying that people aren't allowed to believe things without evidence, just saying that if you expect to convince someone of something, you better bring the evidence.
And specifically, if you want to convince ME (the author of the sentiment) I'm not going to listen if you don't demonstrate your claims with science.
11:13 AM (edited) +4
Cody Sovis - The whole point of faith is to believe in something in spite of having no proof in it. I just can't base my life on something that, in my opinion, goes against nearly every experience of every person to have ever lived.
Scot Rafkin - The comment is based on a questionable and probably false premise: "Deities are not falsifiable".
Peter Darley - I think it's true that many deities are not falsifiable, which is an excellent reason to not believe they exist.
Paul T Morrison - Not a straw man as it is a very defined statement which does not replace a pro religious argument with anything but, "show me proof."
One nitpicky point. I don't think it is necessary to force the religious person to use the scientific method. Showing direct evidence is not the scientific method. It's just showing data. If I showed you an invisible pick unicorn (or maybe just her hot b
Join Think Atheist
Welcome toThink Atheist
Get Started Nowor Sign In
Or sign in with:
Sunday School July 27th 2014
Sunday School July 20th 2014
Sunday School July 13th 2014
Started by Gallup's Mirror in Bible thumpers. Last reply by H3xx 54 minutes ago.
Started by Ed in Small Talk. Last reply by Cesar Deicide 2 hours ago.
Started by Unseen in Politics, Economics, Civil and Reproductive Rights, International Conflicts. Last reply by Unseen 9 hours ago.
Started by Davis Goodman in Small Talk. Last reply by Gregg R Thomas 14 hours ago.
Started by RobertPiano in Religion and the Religious, Atheism and Atheists. Last reply by Muckle Cuddy 18 hours ago.
August 15, 2014 at 5pm to August 17, 2014 at 6pm – Radisson Hotel Denver Southeast
Posted by D.M Barrera on July 21, 2014 at 10:00am
Posted by Quincy Maxwell on July 20, 2014 at 9:37pm
When you drink water, how is it distributed around the body?
We are in love with our Amazon
Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!
Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com
In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media
© 2014 Created by Dan.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.