Views: 137

Comment by ɐuɐz ǝllǝıuɐp on October 27, 2013 at 2:19pm

1) An atheist is not confined to the male gender of humanity, you get women atheists and gender variant atheists to.

2) The second line... lol wat.. invisible means of support , one would call this line derp, or correctly stipulate that it does not make any logical sense at all, and the talk of support, support in what ? mass ? density ? is it emotional ? There are many numerous methods one can obtain emotional support, if the one fails you can always find another. Myself I use my art and music as my emotional support, sometimes friends are emotional support... oh they mean by invisible...  as in something that has a cloaking device ? now we talking about extraterrestrials, star trek and amazing technology... but an imaginary support , is supposed to pretend to support something... kind of like asking my stuffed animal or my pillow to fetch me a glass of water or a cup of tea.

Comment by Doug Reardon on October 27, 2013 at 7:43pm

As Delos McKowan said: The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike.

Comment by Warren on October 27, 2013 at 7:46pm

Kind of like Carl Sagan talking about the invisible dragon in the garage. Can you prove that it's not there? More like, can you prove that it is there?

Comment by _Robert_ on October 27, 2013 at 11:04pm

First message on a church sign I ever agreed with.

Comment by SteveInCO on October 28, 2013 at 1:30am

First message on a church sign I ever agreed with.

I suppose it's not technically an inaccuracy for them to have failed to point out that a theist has no such means either, so yes.


You need to be a member of Think Atheist to add comments!

Join Think Atheist

© 2018   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service