Jesus knew what he was doing when he wrote the Constitution. Buy an assault rifle, tote the Bible, show a little cleavage and above all, don't use birth control. It's the Christian thing to do.
Way to go, Hobby Lobby.
Arthur Schlesinger once said that more wars have been fought between groups speaking different languages than between groups with religious differences. And that makes sense: the inability to effectively communicate.
Well I don't agree with that statement, since religion effects one's state of consciousness. People make their choices , decisions, and problem , when they based it on morality which is based on an ideology.
If their is a communication barrier, and there is understanding, compassion combined with reason and logic. Quarrels can easily be solved with the understanding that there is a communication barrier and more effort needs to made that opposing people would understand. Using imagery such as pictures, glyphs and symbols is the best way to communicate when language and text is complicated and different from each other from opposing cultures.
Belief in religion tends to cloud the conscious thought and references of morals are attached to text and doctrine from holy books as guidelines, where logic, reason, compassion and understanding.
would normally prevent a quarrel between different cultures.
I think religions can't survive without wars ... they constantly need to find a new enemy to maintain cohesion
Wars are more typically over border disputes, battling for access to resources, and other matters having little or nothing to do with religion. Even in the case of Hitler's genocide of the Jews, their religion was a Maguffin. He was equally opposed to gypsies. Judaism may have defined the Jews as a target, but he was opposed to them for quasi-racial reasons, not religious reasons.
lol Really ?
@Omar - It depends upon how you define a "war." If you mean shooting wars, no. If you mean wars over perceived differences in values, perhaps.
@Unseen I have to at least partly agree with your 'different languages' argument. However, doesn't that take it back to religion again? After all, wasn't it god who 'did there [Babel] confound the language of all the Earth'? ;-)
Join Think Atheist
Welcome toThink Atheist
Get Started Nowor Sign In
Or sign in with:
Started by Raymond in Society. Last reply by Raymond yesterday.
Started by Unseen in Technology & Gaming. Last reply by Simon Mathews 22 minutes ago.
Started by Michael in Ethics & Morals. Last reply by Davis Goodman 4 hours ago.
Started by Ed in Small Talk. Last reply by matt.clerke 10 hours ago.
Started by Ed in Small Talk. Last reply by Gallup's Mirror 8 hours ago.
Sunday School May 24th 2015
Sunday School May 17th 2015
Sunday School May 10th 2015
Posted by Andy Hoke on May 25, 2015 at 10:57pm
Posted by Reg The Fronkey Farmer on May 23, 2015 at 5:00pm
Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com
© 2015 Created by umar.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.