Serial monogamist, but never married! My current "partner" is an exotic dancer, 16 years younger than me, and she has given me a different perspective on female sexuality entirely.
It's the same BS different day. Headin' back to hot and muggy.Finally replaced my beach crusier so I can pedal some of my winter non-smoking flab away. Just workin' on cleaning up the MP3 tags on my music collection. (only 20K tracks to go)
Hi there TAA. Our small organisation has no such rules in fact religion plays no part in our activities. Co-incidentally none of our group attend church or appear to have any religious belief! When in Africa and I am asked "Where do you worship?" I reply, "I will tell you the truth but you're not going to like what I tell you." They look at me as if I beamed in from another planet!
thanks for the comment. i leave the comments section open and thank people for their comments because people's comments help me to gauge what people find interesting reading among the links. using past comments i've found that people find interesting any controversial discussions within the ranks of skeptics such as the accomodationist/confrontationist debate, as well as stuff about evolution and astronomy.
closing the comments would prevent me from getting this feedback.
the reason why i ask that discussion on a specific link/topic/subject be undertaken in the comments is twofold. one, discussions in the comments of a blog post are hard to follow on the Ning format on which TA is hosted making the starting of a new thread or adding to an already existing thread preferable and, two, because it's exceedingly difficult given the Ning search feature on TA to find things efficiently without the proper tags. since the subjects covered by the Sunday School series are so numerous and varied it would take dozens of different tags for each edition of the series. accordingly, it's best to have someone wishing to discuss a subject covered by one of the links to start their own thread that has the appropriate tags that would allow for efficient searching of content down the road.
regarding the evolutionary basis for morality, i'm trying to figure out if you're being a bit pedantic and are suggesting that i should have said "the evidence for the evolutionary basis for morality" or if you're suggesting that there isn't an evolutionary basis for morality. if the first, i'm sorry for not being as clear as you might have liked. if the second, maybe we could suggest some titles for reading to each other.
who said i was only accepting positive comments? assuming your comment was a negative comment and i wasn't accepting them i would have deleted it. but i don't view the comment you left as a negative one in the sense of critiquing my having included the video among the links i provided. you were critiquing the video itself, not its inclusion. surely, even given your criticism of the video i linked to, you still would agree that it is interesting. you wouldn't say that i shouldn't have included it in the list of links i provided, would you? all i was saying is that rather than get into the discussion of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the video right there it would be best to discuss that elsewhere.
can you perhaps point me to a scientist in a relevant field- other than one who rejects an evolutionary basis for morality given their religious presuppositions of course- who argues against an evolutionary basis for morality?
I just found out I had a wall! So a late reply? Thanks I guess haha - sure is not the most popular thing but I do like to be blunt and express my true thoughts - I am not one to be politically correct if that is even the term.
No, I'm not having any trouble with posting on the site. I've been pretty active in the last hour, so I suspect your problem is not caused by the site's server. But that's just my semi-educated guess. :-)
I noticed that you sent me a comment last night. Sorry I didn't reply, but I seem to have been using my computer last night sometime after I had gone to sleep. I might have been logged into the site, but not logged into my head.
From the looks of it, you seem to have resolved the issue?
if only you were this christmas in PR! i work in plaza las americas and it was madness!!!!!! people shopping as if it was the last moment of their lives! insane!!!!
btw. its kinda ironic that you would like to live here, because i just want to get out of here! when i graduate from college i just want to travel the world, and canada is at the top of my list ;)
honestly no i havent :S ! i dont know how to work on this site that much! :s im not good with this kind of stuff, besides im new so im "exploring" lol :P
Sydni Moser
Hi TA, welcome to 'Green Atheists'. Look forward to your future activity in the group and getting to know you better.
Jan 10, 2010
Adrian
Mar 11, 2010
Dallas the Phallus
Mar 26, 2010
NoSacredCow
Mar 26, 2010
NoSacredCow
Mar 26, 2010
Sydni Moser
Just wanted to stop by and say, Hi... I enjoy reading your comments, you are so well informed and articulate. Glad we're 'friends'...
Apr 14, 2010
Dallas the Phallus
Apr 17, 2010
NoSacredCow
;p
May 4, 2010
NoSacredCow
May 5, 2010
Angela Gorman
Oct 13, 2010
Nelson
closing the comments would prevent me from getting this feedback.
the reason why i ask that discussion on a specific link/topic/subject be undertaken in the comments is twofold. one, discussions in the comments of a blog post are hard to follow on the Ning format on which TA is hosted making the starting of a new thread or adding to an already existing thread preferable and, two, because it's exceedingly difficult given the Ning search feature on TA to find things efficiently without the proper tags. since the subjects covered by the Sunday School series are so numerous and varied it would take dozens of different tags for each edition of the series. accordingly, it's best to have someone wishing to discuss a subject covered by one of the links to start their own thread that has the appropriate tags that would allow for efficient searching of content down the road.
regarding the evolutionary basis for morality, i'm trying to figure out if you're being a bit pedantic and are suggesting that i should have said "the evidence for the evolutionary basis for morality" or if you're suggesting that there isn't an evolutionary basis for morality. if the first, i'm sorry for not being as clear as you might have liked. if the second, maybe we could suggest some titles for reading to each other.
Oct 24, 2010
Nelson
can you perhaps point me to a scientist in a relevant field- other than one who rejects an evolutionary basis for morality given their religious presuppositions of course- who argues against an evolutionary basis for morality?
Oct 24, 2010
Tifany Twisted
It's a pleasure to be here. Cheers!
Dec 15, 2010
Michael Odell
Dec 24, 2010
Dustin
Jan 20, 2011
Snowcrash
Cool, glad you like it :)
It's one of my favorites to , but that's pretty obvious seeing as i use the name :)
Feb 3, 2011
Heather Spoonheim
Feb 26, 2011
Heather Spoonheim
Feb 26, 2011
Albert Bakker
Feb 26, 2011
Atheist Exile
Hi T A A,
No, I'm not having any trouble with posting on the site. I've been pretty active in the last hour, so I suspect your problem is not caused by the site's server. But that's just my semi-educated guess. :-)
Feb 26, 2011
Atheist Exile
Yeah, I'm on FireFox too . . .
. . . AND . . .
. . . I just lost my connection with the site. So I guess there really IS a problem with their server.
Feb 26, 2011
Kris Feenstra
I noticed that you sent me a comment last night. Sorry I didn't reply, but I seem to have been using my computer last night sometime after I had gone to sleep. I might have been logged into the site, but not logged into my head.
From the looks of it, you seem to have resolved the issue?
Feb 26, 2011
Vrinelly
btw. its kinda ironic that you would like to live here, because i just want to get out of here! when i graduate from college i just want to travel the world, and canada is at the top of my list ;)
Mar 1, 2011
Vrinelly
Mar 2, 2011
Michael Andrews
Mar 5, 2011
Michael Andrews
Mar 5, 2011