A group for science enthusiasts of all types -- professionals, amateurs, students, anybody who loves science.
Latest Activity: Jan 15
Started by Pope Beanie. Last reply by Ken Hughes Mar 18, 2014.
Started by Radu Andreiu. Last reply by Pope Beanie Dec 3, 2013.
Started by Sadly 'M' iCantSay. Last reply by Dave G Jun 15, 2013.
Started by David Kenneth Craggs. Last reply by Jake Morrisse Apr 6, 2013.
Started by Nathan Hevenstone. Last reply by Nelly Bly Feb 24, 2013.
Started by Hope Jan 1, 2013.
Started by Matt. Last reply by R Allan Worrell Feb 23, 2012.
Started by Morgan Matthew. Last reply by Jim Sky Feb 14, 2012.
Started by Hope. Last reply by Chris Thomas Jan 26, 2012.
Started by Sydni Moser. Last reply by Akshay Bist Jul 26, 2011.
Started by Jason Lamar Sorensen. Last reply by Jim Sky Jul 11, 2011.
Started by Pope Beanie. Last reply by Pope Beanie Mar 21, 2011.
Started by landofhopeanglory Jan 6, 2011.
Started by Docteur Stephan Halbeisen. Last reply by doone Dec 29, 2010.
Started by Pancake Croissant. Last reply by Bill Dec 28, 2010.
Started by Radu Andreiu Dec 18, 2010.
Started by Sydni Moser. Last reply by No name Dec 6, 2010.
Started by Jesus_Was_A_Man_Or_Myth_Or_Both. Last reply by Jesus_Was_A_Man_Or_Myth_Or_Both Nov 30, 2010.
Started by day vo. Last reply by day vo Nov 12, 2010.
Started by day vo Nov 12, 2010.
- Look at these poor girls' feet, Samantha. How sad. They couldn't even figure out what a high heel designer shoe is for if they ever saw one.
- On the other hand, Carrie, I'm sure the boys must be very dextrous with their funny toes. Hmmm...
Meh, color me skeptical. As in Michio Goes To Hollywood.
Besides, I think they're using the wrong frequencies.
Is time travel possible? In this fascinating short documentary, director Jay Cheel explores the real-life theories behind the science of time travel and the strange subculture of enthusiasts who are obessed with it.
Meet Michio Kaku, world-renowned theoretical physicist and author of the book Hyperspace.
Meet Rob Niosi, a hobbyist building his own full-scale home replica of H.G. Wells’ time machine.
Meet Larry Haber, the entertainment lawyer representing the family of John Titor, an alleged time traveller from the year 2036.
Do these people know something about the world that the rest of us don’t? Obsessed and Scientific is a quirky look at the intersection of science-fact and science-fiction.
Watch this for FREE HERE:
Paul writes: "The dictionary I use most often says denies the existence of God, but now I see another def using lack." Let's keep in mind that the word we're defining is "atheism," not "atheist" (which is another reason why Rocky's suggestion doesn't work). Yes, some sources may define atheism as the denial of the existence of God, but that construction, too, looks at the word from the theist's stubborn perspective. First, it presupposes God's existence; second, it casts the atheist's position as contrarian, which, in its simplest and purest form, it certainly is not. The "denial" definition places the atheist in the position of saying, "No, he does not!" to the theist's claim, "God exists." But that's mistaken, because the essence of atheism is belief; or rather, that is, its absence. The atheist does not necessarily assert that gods do not exist. Indeed, whether gods exist or not is beside the point. The atheist may be indifferent to the question of whether gods exist. He is simply without theistic belief. That's it.Michel, "shortage" doesn't work for the same reason "lack" doesn't work. What's more, a shortage of something is merely an insufficiency. By definition, when a shortage of a thing exists, there is usually some of it, but not enough. I realize this is a small point, but it is not an insignificant one. When we atheists define atheism as "the lack of belief in gods," we are unwittingly admitting that something necessary is missing in us. A lack is a deficiency.
When we say that atheism is "the lack of belief in gods," we are accepting the theists' pitying view of our attitude. Atheists are too often hesitant and apologetic about their views, but when it comes to defining the essence of our outlook on existence we should not compromise. We are not deficient in theistic belief. We are without theistic belief. George Smith (below) advocates the phrase "absence of belief," but that phrase does not belong to him, of course, and it predates his book by decades. As the language evolves, all dictionaries revise their entries periodically. Eventually, I'm sure, atheists sitting on dictionaries' usage panels will correct the obdurate and mistaken notion that many dictionaries persist in advancing when defining "atheism."
Rocky writes, "What's wrong with simply, 'an atheist is one who does not believe in a god or gods'?"
Nothing. But that's what "absence of belief" means--it means there is not a belief. It is not there. Period. Absence equals non-existence. When something is described as absent, there is absolutely no implication that it "should" be present.
In the phrase "lack of belief," by contrast, the pejorative connotation is plain and unarguable. A lack is deficiency--by definition. Therefore, one who lacks a belief in gods is missing something that is ostensibly needed. That's why the definition is flawed; it reflects an obvious bias.
Welcome toThink Atheist
Get Started Nowor Sign In
Or sign in with:
Sunday School April 19th 2015
Sunday School April 12th 2015
Sunday School April 5th 2015
Posted by Simon Mathews on April 15, 2015 at 4:14am
Posted by Belle Rose on April 15, 2015 at 1:00am
Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com
© 2015 Created by umar.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.