Atheists who love Science!


Atheists who love Science!

A group for science enthusiasts of all types -- professionals, amateurs, students, anybody who loves science.

Members: 906
Latest Activity: Nov 19

Discussion Forum

When a Devastating Solar CME Hits Earth...

Started by Pope Beanie. Last reply by Ken Hughes Mar 18, 2014. 1 Reply

House M.D. mind-reading technology

Started by Radu Andreiu. Last reply by Pope Beanie Dec 3, 2013. 2 Replies

Will we "Humans" evolve backwards?

Started by Sadly 'M' iCantSay. Last reply by Dave G Jun 15, 2013. 42 Replies

Radio Astronomy... "Sounds" of the Universe

Started by Nathan Hevenstone. Last reply by Nelly Bly Feb 24, 2013. 6 Replies

This was on 60 Minutes- What are your thoughts???

Started by Matt. Last reply by R Allan Worrell Feb 23, 2012. 7 Replies

My Review of the Ganzfeld Procedure

Started by Morgan Matthew. Last reply by Jim Sky Feb 14, 2012. 4 Replies

10 Questions for Stephen Hawking

Started by Sydni Moser. Last reply by Akshay Bist Jul 26, 2011. 18 Replies

Fun Science activities for kids? Any Suggestions?

Started by Jason Lamar Sorensen. Last reply by Jim Sky Jul 11, 2011. 11 Replies

assuming world peace is possible

Started by landofhopeanglory Jan 6, 2011. 0 Replies

Let us talk about unguided processes.

Started by Pancake Croissant. Last reply by Bill Dec 28, 2010. 29 Replies

How the Universe Makes the Building Blocks of Life

Started by Jesus_Was_A_Man_Or_Myth_Or_Both. Last reply by Jesus_Was_A_Man_Or_Myth_Or_Both Nov 30, 2010. 2 Replies

Asteroid Impact Procedures

Started by day vo. Last reply by day vo Nov 12, 2010. 1 Reply

SETI procedures

Started by day vo Nov 12, 2010. 0 Replies

Possible Geoglyphs Spotted in Peru

Started by Sydni Moser. Last reply by Doug Reardon Oct 17, 2010. 1 Reply

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Atheists who love Science! to add comments!

Comment by Free Thought Monk on February 6, 2011 at 4:50pm
Yo, Dune, et alia - I have a question as a relative newbie who is also basically blind. Dune,  I love your links and often go to them and share them on Facebook but would like to give you credit by directing folks here.  However, if I do link them here directly to your posts  - and they are not already members - where will my link on FB take them on Think Atheist?  Thanks.
Comment by Chuck G on February 3, 2011 at 11:47am
Mind boggling and Mind numbing.  The stooopid, it hurts!
Comment by RockyTIJ on February 3, 2011 at 11:32am
Wow.  The man's mind-bogglingly ignorant.  And proud of it.
Comment by Jaume on February 2, 2011 at 11:23am

- Look at these poor girls' feet, Samantha. How sad. They couldn't even figure out what a high heel designer shoe is for if they ever saw one.

- On the other hand, Carrie, I'm sure the boys must be very dextrous with their funny toes. Hmmm...

Comment by Pope Beanie on January 30, 2011 at 2:17am

Meh, color me skeptical. As in Michio Goes To Hollywood.

Besides, I think they're using the wrong frequencies.

Comment by Sydni Moser on January 29, 2011 at 10:12pm

Obsessed and Scientific - Documentary

Is time travel possible? In this fascinating short documentary, director Jay Cheel explores the real-life theories behind the science of time travel and the strange subculture of enthusiasts who are obessed with it.

Meet Michio Kaku, world-renowned theoretical physicist and author of the book Hyperspace.

Meet Rob Niosi, a hobbyist building his own full-scale home replica of H.G. Wells’ time machine.

Meet Larry Haber, the entertainment lawyer representing the family of John Titor, an alleged time traveller from the year 2036.

Do these people know something about the world that the rest of us don’t? Obsessed and Scientific is a quirky look at the intersection of science-fact and science-fiction.


Watch this for FREE HERE:

Comment by Free Thought Monk on January 26, 2011 at 3:09pm
I thought we were all deposits of star-stuff, resulting from some sort of vacuum fluctuation creating something from nothing.  You are suggesting  we merely began in Africa?  Back to my science books I guess. lol
Comment by Don on January 20, 2011 at 8:54am

Paul writes: "The dictionary I use most often says denies the existence of God, but now I see another def using lack." 

Let's keep in mind that the word we're defining is "atheism," not "atheist" (which is another reason why Rocky's suggestion doesn't work). 

Yes, some sources may define atheism as the denial of the existence of God, but that construction, too, looks at the word from the theist's stubborn perspective.   First, it presupposes God's existence; second, it casts the atheist's position as contrarian, which, in its simplest and purest form, it certainly is not.  The "denial" definition places the atheist in the position of saying, "No, he does not!" to the theist's claim, "God exists."  But that's mistaken, because the essence of atheism is belief; or rather, that is, its absence.  The atheist does not necessarily assert that gods do not exist.  Indeed, whether gods exist or not is beside the point.  The atheist may be indifferent to the question of whether gods exist.  He is simply without theistic belief.  That's it.

Michel, "shortage" doesn't work for the same reason "lack" doesn't work.  What's more, a shortage of something is merely an insufficiency.  By definition, when a shortage of a thing exists, there is usually some of it, but not enough. 

I realize this is a small point, but it is not an insignificant one.  When we atheists define atheism as "the lack of belief in gods," we are unwittingly admitting that something necessary is missing in us.  A lack is a deficiency


When we say that atheism is "the lack of belief in gods," we are accepting the theists' pitying view of our attitude.  Atheists are too often hesitant and apologetic about their views, but when it comes to defining the essence of our outlook on existence we should not compromise.  We are not deficient in theistic belief.  We are without theistic belief. 

George Smith (below) advocates the phrase "absence of belief," but that phrase does not belong to him, of course, and it predates his book by decades.  As the language evolves, all dictionaries revise their entries periodically.  Eventually, I'm sure, atheists sitting on dictionaries' usage panels will correct the obdurate and mistaken notion that many dictionaries persist in advancing when defining "atheism."    

Comment by Pope Beanie on January 20, 2011 at 1:59am
Aha, I did not know this. The dictionary I use most often says denies the existence of God, but now I see another def using lack. Frack!
Comment by Pope Beanie on January 20, 2011 at 12:59am
Therefore, one who lacks a belief in gods is missing something that is ostensibly needed.
I'm actually not so sure about what Fred meant.

Members (906)


© 2015   Created by umar.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service