Many if not all human societies have origin myths and they differ greatly.
Several years ago a San Francisco-born-and-raised woman told me she is a materialist.
An hour ago a woman who was raised a Jehovah Witness and has left that faith told me the Big Bang story grew from a human need for a beginning. I agreed.
Can you wholeheartedly accept that the universe had no beginning, that it has always existed?
Being an atheist doesn't mean I think anything per se about anything else, except that I don't believe that there are gods.
It doesn't mean I believe in Evolution, Gravity, or Free Health Care, etc.
It also doesn't mean that I have opinions about the Big Bang, or not.
Again, there is a difference between the belief in the possibility of unicorns and leprechauns, for which there is NO evidence, and, the OPINION that, based upon what I have learned so far (evidence), that the current expansion scenario leads to condensation and a new bang.
Evidence is not proof of course, but you keep confusing things with zero evidence, with things with at least some evidence.
You then treat them as equivalent choices...with an equal chance of outcome, etc.
That is misleading at best, if accidental, and dishonest at worst, if on purpose.
If you do this sort of thing accidentally, I hope you have peers correct your relevant work in your profession before embarrassment/damage, etc.
If you do this sort of thing as a means of trying to argue a particular agenda, then you are being dishonest.
Shame on you Dr, Bob...as this is not the first time pointing this behavior out to you.
The MOST LOGICAL thing is, that DUE TO the infinite time and space involved, TO assume that most of the universe is not observable.
IE: No matter how much of infinite space we DO observe, statistically, it would be an insignificant fraction of the REST of the infinite space.
We barely have a shot at the KNOWN Universe, and that is stretching the current limits of observation already, and, with the edges receding at faster than light speed, that light will never get here TO observe.
I also consider the odds that in an infinite amount of time, and, with the properties of spacetime we know of, there is no compelling argument to theorize that what we are experiencing COULD NOT have happened before....or, COULD NOT happen again.
Only a person who's tendency to think the world was just for them, and we are the center of the universe and god's special snowflake...would PRECLUDE the possibility if not the likelihood of other bangs.
@Bob: The Big Bang was a singular phenomenon
That's a pretty confient wreckless claim for someone cautioning us on the probability of there being a Big Bang and to not make hasty conclusions.
@Bob: any other conclusion is embracing the existence of the unprovable doG
Well the website has had a notable lack of stupid moronic statements this year. I suppose we ought to fill up the quota.
I thought you were an atheist. Isn't the most logical thing to believe there's no such thing as an unknown, unobservable universe?
STOP STRAWMANNING ATHEISM DR. BOB. This is a form of trolling. Don't do it again.
If I can except eternity as a possibility, I don't understand why there absolutely MUST be a limit on time in the other direction. An endless cycle of big bangs and big crunches? Why not? Something else? Why not?