Tags:
My thinking was to keep the discussion down in the area of the fundamentals, rather than wandering off into the weeds, talking about particular verses in the various holy books... how many angels can fit on the head of pin...
It seems to me that to allow the discussion to encompass higher-level ideas in effect grants the premise that the god exists.
As for the nuggets of "supporting evidence" you suggest, I would evaluate them as follows:
a) Circular. Appeal to authority.
b) Non sequitur.
c) Argument from ignorance. Unsupported, and not necessarily related.
d) Argument from ignorance. Unsupported, and not necessarily related.
Thoughts?
Started by Free Thought Monk Jan 12, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Started by LovelyGirl. Last reply by LovelyGirl Apr 13, 2011. 8 Replies 0 Likes
Started by mark julius r. batugal. Last reply by Brice Roughton Nov 21, 2011. 6 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Paul Tourville. Last reply by Paul Tourville Feb 10, 2011. 1 Reply 1 Like
Posted by James C Rocks on November 12, 2020 at 10:49am 5 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by ETRON on September 6, 2019 at 12:44pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
© 2021 Created by Rebel.
Powered by