
A group for non-believers who also reject the dogma of the political left. We are not hostile to the Judeo-Christian traditions of this country but merely apply rationalism to our (non) belief systems.
Members: 31
Latest Activity: Apr 13
Started by RJ Sep 26, 2012. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Hey guys and gals,Very often we get called amoral because of our lack of faith. I personally don't think I'm amoral. I also highly doubt that any of you are amoral. Because of how often I'm…Continue
Started by Jessi. Last reply by RJ Mar 26, 2012. 2 Replies 0 Likes
I very recently read books by Charles Murray and Ron Paul and really loved them, but also found them to be a little too elementary. Anyone have any more suggestions?Continue
Started by Ed Oct 12, 2011. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Pretty funny stuff no matter your political persuasion: http://youtu.be/-YtBxoQEkZ0Continue
Started by xntubes Sep 7, 2011. 0 Replies 1 Like
A good article for atheists who are not thrilled with the left-liberal bias in humanist organisations today.…Continue
Comment
Comment by Scott Howard on March 29, 2012 at 11:19am
Comment by SteveInCO on March 28, 2012 at 8:27pm I think the health care bill is totally unconstitutional. But if the Supremes struck it down for the reasons I would cite, they'd have to strike down almost everything else the government does today.
It's going to in fact hang on the individual mandate... and whether they will decide, if they think the mandate is unconstitutional, to sever it from the rest of the bill in spite of there being no severability clause.
Comment by Scott Howard on March 28, 2012 at 7:37pm
Comment by Michael on March 26, 2012 at 1:53am Like the other Libertarians here, I have reservations about being in the same group as Conservatives. I'm sure there are so few of either here, though, as with most atheist organizations, that combining them was motivated by that. I haven't in fact seen any commenters identifying as Conservatives below. Anyway, glad to see this group exists.
Comment by Danny Sanchez on October 26, 2011 at 7:15pm I agree with Beth.
libertarian |ˌlibərˈte(ə)rēən|
noun
1 an adherent of libertarianism: [ as modifier ] : libertarian philosophy.
• a person who advocates civil liberty.
2 Philosophy a person who believes in the doctrine of free will.
Although as Libertarians we are considered economically conservative we are clearly socially liberal. Conservatives would have you give up your civil liberties because they feel they should impose their personal extreme morals and because they in my opinion falsely believe they can make us safer. I think almost all libertarians believe that we should have the right to do whatever we please so long as we do not infringe on others rights. Or as one of my favorite Libertarians Penn Jillet would say "stupid people should be allowed to do stupid things".
Like others I would like to know why this Libertarian group also has conservatives, since much of what a libertarian believes can be live and let live.
Like legalizing drugs, not getting into consenting adults sex lives which would cover abortion to some extent,getting back to actually making sure our schools educated children on math, science etc and not the vast PC stuff that arises every year. Not bailing out banks and big business.And not invading other countries to start a war
Comment by Mike G on May 27, 2011 at 11:25am Hi Flower,
Libertarians, like most groups, do not agree on everything. There are some who are strict constitutionalists, there are some that are not, and there are some who prefer the Articles of Confederation and consider the Constitution invalid. There are not too many of the last group. Most libertarians are against a national health care system because it is 1) not constitutional; and 2) a huge expansion of the state. I imagine most atheists favor a nationalized health care system because most atheists are somewhere on the left politically.
The idea of a nationalized health care system might sound wonderful, however if you look at the health care systems of Canada and the UK as well as the VA you get a good idea of what it would look like in reality.
Obviously the Constitution could be amended to allow for nationalized health care. In its current incarnation it is resting primarily on the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution, and while I’m no constitutional scholar, I find that a pretty weak justification and thus far the Courts have agreed. So, it might me semantics, but the current healthcare plan drastically increases the reach of the federal government through the interstate commerce clause.
There is really no way to know how health care would be affected by the proposed changes, a “Third-World” healthcare system might be a bit of a stretch, but then again it may not be. The current system works pretty while, except for those people who need and don’t have health insurance. That’s an issue that needs to be addressed, and frankly I don’t know the answer.
I hope I’ve somewhat answered your question.
Comment by Billy on May 27, 2011 at 10:21am
Comment by Mike G on May 27, 2011 at 10:06am
Comment by Adam Childress on September 26, 2010 at 5:39pm Posted by Brad Snowder on May 20, 2013 at 11:29am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.

You need to be a member of Libertarian/Conservative Atheists to add comments!