CA lawmakers pass bill to teach LGBT history
SACRAMENTO, Calif (Reuters) - A bill to require California public schools to teach the historical accomplishments of gay men and lesbians passed the state Legislature on Tuesday in what supporters call a first for the nation.
Governor Jerry Brown, a Democrat, has not said publicly whether he supports the bill, which he has 12 days to sign or veto once it reaches his desk later this month. If he takes no action, the measure would become law automatically.
The bill gained final passage from the state Assembly on a vote of 49-25, without a single Republican supporting it. The measure cleared the state Senate in April.
California already requires public schools to teach the contributions made to society by women and by racial and ethnic groups that were historically discriminated against, such as blacks, Latinos and Native Americans.
Supporters of the latest bill said it would simply include gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender individuals in that existing requirement, making it part of the curriculum in history and other social studies classes.
Read the rest here.
Tags: LGBTQI, education, gay, history, humans, lesbian, transgendered
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Reggie on -
I guess I'll be hearing more about how the gays are ramming their pulsating, homosexual agenda down people's quivering throats.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Kris Feenstra on -
The trick for these people is to relax, let themselves open up, and approach it from the right angle. This should reduce some of the discomfort and reflexive (unthinking) gag response.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Kairan Nierde on -
But don't relax too much.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Kris Feenstra on
-
When I first read this, I thought the legislation was a bit over the top. When it comes to academics, I largely support teaching what only has academic merit and relevance without politicizing it. In that sense, LGBT issues should neither be mandatorily included nor excluded; they should be addressed as is appropriate to the subject matter at hand.
After giving it some thought, however, I realized that I was somewhat off the mark. Many curriculums are weakened, in my opinion, by a tendency to avoid controversial issues. Sex and sexuality is just one such issue. I don't see how you can teach health education, civics, history and the arts without addressing sexuality and sexual orientation. These subjects aren't omitted by mere coincidence; they are actively avoided. Perhaps this legislation will help remedy that situation.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Kairan Nierde on
-
I don't think this is just about doing a chapter on American lgbt civil rights, making Roman and Greek cultural studies accurate, or adding to the curriculum on Weimar Germany.
We have to also consider that many important and supporting actors are entirely omitted from history simply because they are not rich, western, christian, land-owning, white, heterosexual, cisgender* males.
Another similar but separate issue is the omission of harmless indicators of sexuality (mentioning a Boston marriage, lifelong "Roommate", or partner) from biographical sketches of respected historical figures. This can influence curricula in all subject areas.
*cisgender=conventionally gendered: male or female
-
-
Permalink Reply by Dallas the Phallus on -
It's all just part of our fiendish gay agenda to bring the US down through a combination of sodomy and public education. Muhahahahahahahaha!
-
What's new today
Discussion Forum
Bisexual Atheists?
Started by Skycomet the Fallen Angel. Last reply by Kris Feenstra Mar 24. 31 Replies 0 Likes
Blog Posts
Why Respect Relgion - A Post From FB.
Posted by Robert Karp on May 21, 2013 at 10:34am 3 Comments 0 Likes
Events
Services we love
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
