Would you eat it? I certainly would. This question is also directed at vegetarians. My personal feelings are that it would be a healthier/safer/more sanitary way to go about meat. What are your thoughts?

Tags: meat, vegetarian

Views: 459

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You just reminded me that I once had rancid caribou fat while in the territories.  That was pretty vile.

Same here, but I do have a clear knowledge of what happened to what I actually eat, which I strongly believe is preferable to the naivite of those which have never witnessed it.

Same things apply to vegeterians (any 'denomination'), send them to where their food actually comes from. Agriculture and animal husbandry are far from the pretty sights advocated by the tiny minority which perform them.

Yeah, let's not forget about all those labourers who receive terrible wages for all that hard work harvesting vegetables.
Which is part of the reason I no longer fight meat but Big Ag and Big Pharma instead.
@Heather and T A A: I was not attacking big meat/agri/pharma/etc. I agree there are major issues regarding the regulation of these businesses, especially in the US, but I thread increadibly lightly around criticising them as there are no other system of food production, the first and foremost raison d'etre of societey, which can barely compare to it. Disruptions to the foodsystem, even ever so slight, have so massive social effects there can be no false flags. There was a product which had a scare in the US, I believe it was ruccola salad, which has never went beyond 50% of previous sales after a false food borne illness scare. We should not allow ourselves to hold strong opinions about it without absolute scientific evidence.

Better evidence: Take the Creutzfeld-Jakob disease. It tong a damned long time, i believe it was 10-15 years, and possibly a few hundred deaths, for the scientists to sound the alarm bell. They were erroneously heavily critizied. Look what happened when the bell was rung - it was complete and utter chaos and countless billions in losses. It was also the right thing to do.

But what if they had jumped the gun and been wrong? Then all those wasted billions could have been pumped into healthcare that potentially saved thousands. Or research which did the same, or even just broadened our horizons. When the effects of being wrong are so huge vs the cost of a much smaller loss of life until evidence is irrefutable, let's wait for the conclusive scientific statement and not conjecture.

I was actually trying to offer something that I felt supported your position, although I guess it came off sounding sarcastic.

Then please accept my apologies for misinterpreting.

The interwebs allow poorly for the transfer of non-verbal context :/

At last something we agree upon! I think though it would stop consumption rather than reduce it.

MMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Meat- yes I would...

Better than crappy meat, skinny, "naturally" grown scranny, underfed, digging in the dirt, oil-soaked, natural chickens-

Have you ever seen chickens or other animals in poor countries??? Have you ever been on a farm, ranch or any where where food is actually grown- ever-- my relatives are ranchers and farmers- what they do is not what is on the horrible "documenatries"- most are not-

Name a food  that is not genetically modified by humans over the last 10 thousand years??????????

If you really really really like meat then you'll love this - otherwise you might just turn vegan:

I think my arteries hardened by the end of the video :P

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

Backup your stuff: Dropbox and SugarSync.

Atheist Web Hosting. TA members get 20% off
RFEHosting.com
We are in love with our Amazon
Book Store!

 

Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m

© 2013   Created by Morgan Matthew.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service