...a couple staffers had been armed?

Tags: control, gun, guns, killings, mass

Views: 8485

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

In short, he shot his way in and virtually no school is prepared to stop that kind of intrusion, unless you want schools to be fortified like a branch of the Federal Reserve (which 99% of school districts could never afford). This is why you need to give up on a perimeter defense for intrusions like this and have some sort of plan after intrusion. This school had no defenses, and most schools don't. A perimeter defense might work against people who want to come in for nefarious but non-lethal reasons.

Of course, the other option is to throw in the towel and say "Shit happens. You can't defend against everything," which is probably what will end up happening. Like I said elsewhere, these things may be happening more, but the losses are so small (several dozen people in a year from mass killings) that the rate of deaths in this country of 315 million is pretty close to 0.000. Of course, that's no comfort.

As for those who are pushing for stopping these killings by turning in people who are acting weird, obsessed with death, etc., most of us are simply not going to do that to a friend, and parents are likely to be in denial. Also, in many cases, they are asymptomatic, keeping their thoughts and obsessions to themselves.

To have this in perspective, how many such gun incidences do we have in Switzerland. Here is a report about the Swiss who have more guns in the population than I think the US but violent is so low they don't keep records of it.

I think, the solution to the American problem is not have more people having guns, but to have less people with guns. Would armed guards have reduced the death toll, maybe depending on how fast they responded and whether there was a protracted gun battle or not because then you can't tell where the bullets would land.

But, clearly, those having less guns would be those who (a) obey the law and (b) those who don't feel a serious want or need to have one. This will just leave guns in the hands of the wrong people.

Unfortunately the bad guys will always have the means to acquire guns. The best is to find a way of ensuring that people are disposessed of their guns

Guns create more problems than they solve. If you wish to own a gun then you should at the very least have to go through a similar process to that of getting a drivers license.

The tens of millions of law abiding gun owners in America would disagree. Guns in the hands of deranged unstable people are the problem. 

So what's your fix action?

I was wondering the same thing. How does he propose to fix the problem while we remain a country where you are free and "innocent till proven guilty." 

Yeah, I feel people need a license to breed too, but I don't think that will ever happen.

I don't mean to brag, but I have a license to breed.

Ha, doesn't mean we can't try to restrict it.

I think a driver's license is too easily obtained. Considering that the number one cause of death for people age 16 - 24 is car accidents, I think more should be required on both fronts.

RSS

Events

Services we love!

© 2015   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service