Why sin does not exist--according to what most Christians believe.

In relation to my previous discussion on ethics, I am interested in others views on "sin."

Now, for a Christian that believes Jesus dies to save them from their sins, and believe Paul when he said the laws no long apply--this means technically, there is no such thing as sin.  You see, if there are no laws, then there is nothing to break--hence no such thing as sin.

Christian will claim they follow the "Ten Commandments"--but those were part and parcel of the laws--they were not separated from any of the other OT laws--so they too no longer apply.  The distinctions between civil, moral and ceremonial laws are arbitrary--imposed on the text from outside of the text.  Men separated them for their own convenience.  Oh, and just for amusements sake, the real ten commandments that are said to be in the ark of the covenant are in Exodus 34, and end with "Don't cook your goats in mother's milk"--lol.  Yes, it's true!  I find some of the best comedies and tragedies within the pages of that book!..:)

If Christians claim all they must do is love Jesus and love their neighbors as themselves, they are wrong about that too.  You see, Jesus did not say the laws no longer apply--Paul did!  So really, Christians who claim the laws no longer apply are followers of Paul--not Jesus.  Jesus said to follow ALL the laws and ALL the prophets until heaven and earth disappear.  (Matt 5:17-20)

So, if Christians believe the OT laws no longer apply, they are followers of Paul, and there is no "sin," as sin is defined as a transgression against god's laws.  If Christians do follow the OT laws, then they are followers of Jesus, and can commit sin.

Personally, I believe that if you teach someone they are good and worthy, and if they make a mistake they must take responsibility for their actions, you will have many more people doing things that are good and worthy, as opposed to the "born sinners' who are taught they cannot help but to "sin" as no one is "good"

So what do you think a Christian means by "sin"?

Views: 1361

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Anything you're doing that they do not approve of.

Lust, Greed, Sloth, Pride, Wrath, Envy, Gluttony, Masturbation, Homosexuality, Atheism

Those are the 10 deadly sins!  All created by men, and some of which are not vices at all.  An example of which would be "pride." 

I agree with Aristotle as to the definition of pride. According to Aristotle, pride is a virtue, and is the mean between humbleness and arrogance. Pride is having the proper amount of self respect.  Humbleness is defined as:

1. Marked by meekness or modesty in behavior, attitude, or spirit; not arrogant or prideful.
2. Showing deferential or submissive respect: a humble apology.

3. Low in rank, quality, or station; unpretentious or lowly:

Definition 3 goes along with the teaching that Christians are dirty filthy sinners," and it follows that those that are taught they are "lowly dirty filthy sinners" will have more of a tendency to exhibit the vices mentioned above, leading to "moral laxity."  However, when one has the proper amount of self respect, i.e, "pride," they are more likely to exhibit the other virtues, for as not to do so would be to disrespect themselves as well as disrespect others.

Humbleness is only a "virtue" to those who use it to manipulate the "sheeple."

But as I already mentioned, according to Paul, there is no such thing as sin, if a sin is defined as a transgression against god's laws--as there are no laws!  Silly Christians....;)

Anything that makes us happy here :)

My interpretations of the things attributed to Jesus that you are talking about was that the "love thy neighbor as thyself" was supposedly his summation of all that the old Law basically boiled down to.  That's because (if I recall correctly) some "establishment" rabbi trying to trip him up had asked him to sum up the Law.  I was just about to say that I'd be damned (ahem) if I could see how "thou shalt not boil a kid in its mother's milk" could possibly have any relation to that.... then I realized you'd quoted the very same rule.  I believe THAT set of ten commandments was replacement for the more famous ten after Moses threw his hissy fit.

The "goats milk" commandment is part of the final commandments in Exodus 34. (I wonder why we never see it on court room walls though..lol)  The original commandments that Moses broke  in Exodus 20 also contain this commandment--but these commandments are not specifically called the "Ten Commandments" until Exodus 34.  Moses broke the originals in Exodus 32, and trudges back up the mountain for a new copy in Exodus 34.  These are the ones said to be in the ark of the covenant.  Rather hilarious ...:)

Love they neighbor as thyself--yes, how does "boiling goats" fit into that?  Or, on the other hand, if one happens to be a masochist, and loves himself by whipping himself daily--does that mean he should also whip his neighbor too?  How ridiculous.

But that is not really what Jesus meant.  He told them to love god and love their neighbors as themselves. ( Matt. 22:35-40)  All the laws "hang" on these two.  This does not mean the other laws do not apply, but means that if you do not love god, and do not love your neighbor then you cannot follow god's laws.  One follows the other, or "hangs" on it. 

My very good friend is Jewish, and evidently the modern day interpretation of the goat/milk decree is now evidenced by the rejection of meat with cheese on.  Consequently, as the cat meme goes, "I can not haz cheeseburger". 

Seriously, she cannot eat a cheeseburger.  Or a lasagne.  Or put Parmesan on her spaghetti Bolognese.  Or have a meat feast pizza.  Who knew Moses was going to so interfere with modern day fast food?

I will say this: some Christians will claim that Jesus's crucifixion was "the end" or whatever. When he said "it is finished!" I really don't get why he'd bother advising people about how to act for the next few years/months/weeks before his death and resurrection, but... apparently all the laws applied up *until* he died and rose again.


...but that wouldn't explain why they still follow some of the laws. You know. The convenient ones.

Yes, those are some of my favorite passages too.  Who exactly was there to witness that event?  Ahhh--those same people that were there to "witness" any so-called "event" in the gospels.  Nobody--since they were all written a generation or two after he supposedly died by authors unknown.  I totally agree--someone made it all up! 


© 2023   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service