Why punish the theft of $1000 more than the theft of $100?

Views: 18

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sometimes it's harder to replace more. Say both thieves had spent their spoils & are caught. It'd be easier to replace the $100 versus the $1,000. The act may be the same & the act may be carried out again by both parties, but in the end it's really 'bout payin' restitution to the courts of like 1,000%+.
This is similar to the attempted murder vs murder argument. Both criminals have the same mind-set here, and both need to be rehabilitated as such. If you're capable of stealing five dollars from a child or a million dollars from a bank, the fact is you are capable of stealing and that must be corrected. It's silly, but having different punishments for the same crime is like telling the criminal, "Don't feel bad about robbing the convenience store, the law says it's not nearly as bad as robbing the bank across the street!"

Although when you through the Robin Hood angle into the mix, it makes matters that much more confusing.

RSS

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service