I think it is obvious that Christianity has become mostly benign and secularized for the most part and I don't see Christians subjugating their women and executing gays in the ways that take place in the Islamic world due to the quran and Hadith (the Hadith is the so-called writings of the prophet and his followers in which Islamic Shariah law is based from); but I see too many atheists tending to bash Christianity and giving excuses for Islam. Why is this so when according to the Islamic faith, we atheists are "kafar" should be the first ones killed before the Christians and Jews (especially me, since I am an apostate since I was "born" a Muslim); therefore, why do atheists tend to give excuses for the true evils of the Islamic faith??
Jesus Christ as a symbol (whether he was a real person or not) is a much better role model than the child molesting, murderous, and evil "prophet" called Muhammad. The Bible doesn't demand governments to be Christian but the Quran demands that all governments be Islamic by nature and the punishments are much more bizarre. In Islam, you can not even ask any questions about Muhammad or Allah but Christians and Jews are able to debate within themselves and ask questions. When a cartoon is drawn or a quran is burnt you see how savagely Muslims act throughout the world and those who are "moderate" instead of condemning the barbaric acts blame the "Salman Rushdie's" or the "Pastor" instead of placing blame on the perpetrators and culture of violence in the Islamic world. So why is it, that Christianity is often (in my opinion) overly criticized and Islam is not criticized enough when the gravest threat to the existence of the human race is surely an Islamic regime with nuclear weapons?? I'd like to get your opinions..
Mark, all good points. I guess my problem is with the attitude. You can argue and fight to defend the position, but I've seen at least five or six ad hominems in the brief time I've been on this discussion thread. I havent even looked through them all yet, because frankly, his responses have been so virulent. I think a good debate has a give and take on both sides and each come out having learned a little more, and the spirit of the argument is in play.
So, perhaps I should modify clause two to clarify the conflicting feelings I have regarding this discussion:
1) Sassan's desire to win a debate trumps any care for civility or self-reflection. That is a trait I do not wish to have. etc, etc.
I am not here to make friends. :) I am here to discuss issues; particularly issues of such vital importance as of this one.
And Ryan, when one claims that the Muslims don't take the Quran and Hadith seriously; and that Islamic oppression is due to western culture, there is no alternative than to attack such individuals positions and naivety ferociously.
Well, one of those two things is true, and it's not the part about discussing the issues.
It seems as though you are here to verbally slam anyone who doesn't agree with you and then declare yourself the victor of a discussion (for which I didn't know a victor was possible) repeatedly only to come back and slam them over and over again. This is not limited to this discussion. I have noticed this behavior over several threads. It's become a trend. Forget about making friends, I don't even care to have discussions with you. I posted what I posted as a heads up that if your behavior continues, you'll find yourself posting to an empty thread sooner rather than later. It's not worth my time to continue this any further. Take my two cents or leave it, I don't care.
"there is no alternative to attack such individuals positions and naivety ferociously."
Aaaaand I rest my case. Can we make the three o'clock tea time, your honor?
If muslims become a majority, and that majority collectively votes in the West for the introduction of sharia principles in law, then that's democracy isn't it? Don't you support democracy?
So, when I say you are a self-hating masochist I mean it. You would even allow the possibility of Shariah?? Do you even know what Shariah is?? IT is law based on "Allah's principles" and therefore there would be no more democracy. That democratic movement and revolution in Iran in 1979' worked quite well for freedom and democracy, didn't it??