Look, I myself have instances of fumblefingers, and I make typos from time to time. I'm no stickler for Oxford English and I pepper my writing with colloquialisms. I use "ain't" and "gonna" and "hopefully" (which technically should be "one hopes"). Occasionally, I'll even say "anxious" when I should say "eager" (to be anxious is to be suffering from anxiety, not full of anticipation).
However, there seem to be two categories of people who don't know how to spell, to puncuate, or form actual sentences. 1) Hillbillies playing a banjo out on some Appalachian porch or 2) people under the age of 30.
Did the schools stop teaching English? Did it become an optional course in high school? Were the kids skipping class in favor of smoking dope? Is it too much texting? What's going on here?
By cracky (LOL), back in my day we graduated students prepared for college. Today many good institutions of higher education spend the first year bringing the students up to speed on skills they should have learned in high school.
You are assuming that spending more money necessarily improves the result.
Inflation adjusted spending for education has been growing by leaps and bounds over the past few decades yet actual results have been stagnant if not getting worse. Spending the money we are already giving to the system with better methodologies and perhaps not spending so much on administrative overhead would be more effective than simply shoveling more cash into the failed schools; from a bureaucratic standpoint that is rewarding failure.
It was an observation, not a stereotype. As I observed, I also run into young people who actually know how to use English and reward them with a compliment when I do.
And yet, young people whose skill with the language is impressive tend to be the exception, not the rule.
And it isn't only English. Our country is falling behind other countries having higher academic standards in math and the sciences. I think most educations in the arts are probably time wasted (and that includes my own major of philosophy). Since time immemorial, people have learned the arts by being an apprentice or understudy. And any employer who likes an applicant's artistic portfolio best but rejects them because they lack a degree is really foolish.
Academia is needed to teach math, science, and subjects based on or applying those skills. The idea that someone should go to a university to learn, say, photography (one of my own skills) is something I find lauighable. And, further, I find it sad and outrageous that kids will graduate with a "degree" in something like painting or poetry, ending up with a student loan debt of $40K, which will take a very long time to pay off with an annual income of $25K-$30K a year.
I disagree, a bit or two. I think that attaining a four-year degree in anything is an indication of one's ability to focus on goals, and to intelligently persevere to attain a long term goal. Sure, some philosophy can be totally useless, but I feel strongly that interest and study in philosophy often leads to useful enlightenment of human consciousness, just as science enables enhancements of health and the general human condition. Just like other arts, philosophy is one of those endeavors that can connect and enrich us, intellectually.
I'm OK with photography, but I wish I had more talent/aptitude for it. I can understand why some people feel it's a significant vocation to work on. Photography is another man-made tool that can be used to frame reality in interesting, enlightening ways.
Meanwhile, what bothers me the most about people who speak or write carelessly is: by the time I've figured out where they're typically coming from (e.g. what they like to learn about and talk about the most), and how intelligent/learned they are, I've wasted time I could have used to read someone else who's more linguistically talented and more obviously intelligent.
Speaking of 4-year degrees, there's a commercial on TV advertising one, in which the young lady spokesperson invites us to "call and axe for a brochure" - that is like listening to fingernails on a chalkboard.
I believe texting is part of it - the constant search for abbreviated ways to say things - "h8 it!"
Then too, there's no one around that they respect and admire to stress its importance, i.e., to make it "cool."
Respect and admiration seem to be misplaced on musicians, actors, and illiterate athletes now. How many kids today really admire a writer like James Salter or even Cormac McCarthy? And as for well-known thinkers like Neil deGrasse Tyson or Richard Dawkins, while kids may admire them, how many aspire to be like them, especially when it might take time away from video games or mindlessly communicating with their peers, who have almost nothing to teach them?
Writing well is a skill, that needs practice and a little study. I have noticed that my writing skill seems to have improved, as I practice. Most of the email programs seem to not have a spellcheck app. Since I don't normally have a dictionary in front of me as I write email, I can get a little lazy checking myself. Please forgive my transgressions in this regard. If I can 'decode' other people's writing, then I can understand, mostly, their intent.
Do a little googling and you'll discover how spectacularly spellcheckers can fail.
" Part of what holds back the black community (as heard on PBS a while ago) isn't racism, it's the view held buy many black students that being good at academic subjects is a "white" thing to do."
Yeah, I do make mistakes. I do know the difference between "by" and "buy." It's not ignorance, it's my age. LOL
I make goofs like that more and more as time goes by, especially when I don't take the time to proofread what I write. The ignorant person would make the mistake, miss it in proofreading, and probably resist being corrected.
I knew when I opened the thread that people would pore over my writing for their J'accuse! or "Ah ha!" moment.
I love it when I type a creative spelling that would actually work but is wrong; it's like some part of my brain between the part that's composing the sentence and the part that's telling my fingers what to do. is doing phonics experiments.
I just attributed it to your flying fingers --