Can you explain why people assume that it's good to be sex-positive? Why be sex-positive instead of sex-skeptical and/or sex-ambivalent? Isn't sex-positivity a form of primitivism and bio-Luddism? What experimental-psychological evidence do sex-positives have to back their claims, if any? And if sex-positivity is not OK, then why is it that a majority of atheists are sex-positive? Or are they not?
Tags: antisex, antisexual, antisexualism, sex, sex-negative, sex-negativity, sex-positive, sex-positivity, sexual, sexual attitudes, More…sexuality
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on June 4, 2012 at 7:20pm "Masturbation usually does not raise any moral questions at all. It is surely the case that many women have found great good in self-pleasuring... (which) actually serves relationships rather than hindering them."
So wrote a little lady who may well have been a bit more sex-positive than she was "supposed" to be, and that's not all she had to say --
http://news.yahoo.com/nuns-book-masturbation-slammed-vatican-194458...
Permalink Reply by Kelin420 on June 4, 2012 at 7:39pm I prefer to be optimistic about sex- as in, I am not positive I will get some-
Sex is better than masturbation- but not as "handy".
Permalink Reply by Gerard Wood on June 7, 2012 at 10:51pm Since we are all fleshbots programmed at random by our language and society and driven by our instincts, it seems to me that all we can do is enjoy what this reality brings without harming others.
Started by Mercedes in Welcome to Think Atheist. Last reply by Magnus Mayus 47 minutes ago. 354 Replies 0 Likes
Posted by Cathy Cooper on May 17, 2013 at 10:00am 3 Comments 0 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
