Joshua, you DO realize we have photographs of Abe Lincoln, right?
What an odd comparison.
We don't even have accurate paintings of Jesus Christ. Compare his paintings and then you'll see Jesus had different colored hair and was also white or dark skinned depending the ethnocentricity of the painter.
Most Atheists will concede a man named Jesus existed. What we contest is all the extra magical "stuff" that is thrown in afterwards.
Not sure if serious
You don't seem like the trolling type - So you DO believe they are ALL fakes?
Your logic seems to be
A man named Jesus existed. Therefore, everything in the bible is true and ALSO he's the son Yahweh.
I hope you can see that proving a man actually existed in no way demonstrates he had magical powers.
Nothing in those wikipedia articles demonstrates he's magical. Only that there is evidence he may have existed as a real man.
Also, I think you'd be quite surprised how much atheists have learned about the topic of Jesus's historicity.
For one, I have watched dozens of debates on the topic from evangelists, Bart Ehrman, Richard Carrier and the like.
I personally believe he existed.
Your turn to prove me that he's magical.
The deluded aspect falls into the category of lunatic.
Also, note that "Legend" can be an obvious 4th option.
Also note that 1 or more options can be accurate as well such as a lying lunatic or a Lunatic Legend or a lying legend.
Hell, for that matter "Lying Lord" or "Lunatic Lord" could be conceivable as well.
Without fools there would be no doGs.
Without the brainwashing of children there would be no Religion.
Hey Renee.Check out this Zeigeist documentary on religion. It blew my mind and seems to make so much sense. If anyone has any comments on it or has seen it before please let me know your thoughts on it!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZgT1SRcrKE